Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 53 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3367 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NON COMPLIANT NEW EV INSTALLATIONS

John Peckham
I was sent some information from the ECA concerning an audit undertaken by the Office of Low Emission Vehicles.


The sites inspected were those installed by "qualified" and "registered" installers claiming the OLEV subsidy.


0.8% were found to be dangerous (C1), 19.6% Potentially Dangerous (C2) and 25.6% requires improvement (C3). That makes 46% of new EV installations by qualified and registered persons to be non-compliant.


Am I the only person who thinks this is an utter disgrace?





Parents
  • 0
    weirdbeard:
    Harry Macdonald:


    And if vacuum cleaners, electric strimmers, lawnmowers, and the like can be class 2, why can't EV chargers be as well and the problem would go away.


    Hi Harry, well said, I have often wondered that myself ?




    Its not just the charger itself you need to consider as the "Final" piece of equipment, you also need to consider the vehicle itself.

    If the vehicle was 100% electric, then in theory not an issue, but with hybrid vehicles where there is a liquid or gaseous hydrocarbon traditional fuel as well as a electric battery for propulsion then there must be an earth thru the EV charger and metalwork/body of the car itself, hence as some people have already mentioned loss of the PEN conductor would be a safety issue for those in contact with vehicle body and ground they are standing on or other earthed metalwork.

     


Reply
  • 0
    weirdbeard:
    Harry Macdonald:


    And if vacuum cleaners, electric strimmers, lawnmowers, and the like can be class 2, why can't EV chargers be as well and the problem would go away.


    Hi Harry, well said, I have often wondered that myself ?




    Its not just the charger itself you need to consider as the "Final" piece of equipment, you also need to consider the vehicle itself.

    If the vehicle was 100% electric, then in theory not an issue, but with hybrid vehicles where there is a liquid or gaseous hydrocarbon traditional fuel as well as a electric battery for propulsion then there must be an earth thru the EV charger and metalwork/body of the car itself, hence as some people have already mentioned loss of the PEN conductor would be a safety issue for those in contact with vehicle body and ground they are standing on or other earthed metalwork.

     


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines