Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 53 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3352 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NON COMPLIANT NEW EV INSTALLATIONS

John Peckham
I was sent some information from the ECA concerning an audit undertaken by the Office of Low Emission Vehicles.


The sites inspected were those installed by "qualified" and "registered" installers claiming the OLEV subsidy.


0.8% were found to be dangerous (C1), 19.6% Potentially Dangerous (C2) and 25.6% requires improvement (C3). That makes 46% of new EV installations by qualified and registered persons to be non-compliant.


Am I the only person who thinks this is an utter disgrace?





Parents
  • 0
    And what really is the problem with a wee spark?

    When I was a lad, every car had at least three continuously sparking devices, the dynamo, the points and the distributor, and the starter motor added a fourth when it was time to go. I never heard of any of these causing a fire.

Reply
  • 0
    And what really is the problem with a wee spark?

    When I was a lad, every car had at least three continuously sparking devices, the dynamo, the points and the distributor, and the starter motor added a fourth when it was time to go. I never heard of any of these causing a fire.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines