Do we simply trust that the manufacturer should have built this protection into the device, and it works?
Surely we have to? After all, if the requirement is covered by a standard, then surely we should be safe in making an assumption that the protection requirement ahs been met - otherwise, why bother with a standard which requires it?
Do we simply trust that the manufacturer should have built this protection into the device, and it works?
Surely we have to? After all, if the requirement is covered by a standard, then surely we should be safe in making an assumption that the protection requirement ahs been met - otherwise, why bother with a standard which requires it?