This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

The Arc Fault Detection Device… again.

Some humourous but valid observations on AFDDs, the state of the industry, the wiring regs and future amendment requirements.

He also attempts to build a AFFD tester which electrically tests rather than relying upon the mechanical action of the test button on the device itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0ElFaKc_e8

Parents
  • Hello Farmboy.

    Thank you for your comments.  I believe the UK is unique in two factors under discussion here. 1) In domestic situations it normally uses cables manufactured to BS 6004 (i.e flat pvc + cpc) and 2) the use of the RFC.  All the manufacturers do indeed claim that AFDDs will operate on a parallel arc in a ring circuit.  Let's consider these two things separately and then combined.


    1).  BS 6004 cables have a central uninsulated cpc positioned between phase and neutral.  The construction of the cable is such that, in my opinion, it is virtually impossible for a parallel arc to occur in such a cable without involving the cpc.  Leakage to the cpc of 30mA will operate the RCD in 40mSecs.  Consider this against the ~ 2 amps and uncertain time of the AFFD; much more energy will be delivered into the fauklt before the AFDD operates.  At less than 2 amps it won't operate anyway.


    2). The various manufacturers are all headquartered outside the UK.  They only encounter BS 6004 cables in the UK sector of their market, a relatively small percentage of the global market.  Their various diagrams and videos of parallel arcs all illustrate phase to neutral faults in "conventional" (to them) wiring installations. None of these show a BS 6004-type cpc positioned between the conductors with an RCD upstream.  When they occasionally think of a ring circuit, they think of "conventional" circular cable types or conduit singles - a different situation. In my opinion, in the UK domestic BS 6004 situation, the AFDD adds no additional fire safety.


    What comes next?  It's already here: the single-module RCBO/AFDD.  If AFDDS are mandated in the UK, these RCBO/AFDDs will be installed by the tens of thousands in the years ahead. Now consider the unqualified householder on a Friday night bank holiday weekend, (Christmas Eve?) and one of these things trips......what tripped it?  Overcurrent?  Earth leakage? Arc fault? Nuisance trip? What do all these green, red, yellow and steady/flashing LEDs mean?  What is this "test" button for?  What chance has the poor householder got of restoring power safely?


    As you may have gathered, I think we are being sold a pup with these things for the UK.  I certainly won't be retrofitting any.

    Regards,

              Colin.



     


     

Reply
  • Hello Farmboy.

    Thank you for your comments.  I believe the UK is unique in two factors under discussion here. 1) In domestic situations it normally uses cables manufactured to BS 6004 (i.e flat pvc + cpc) and 2) the use of the RFC.  All the manufacturers do indeed claim that AFDDs will operate on a parallel arc in a ring circuit.  Let's consider these two things separately and then combined.


    1).  BS 6004 cables have a central uninsulated cpc positioned between phase and neutral.  The construction of the cable is such that, in my opinion, it is virtually impossible for a parallel arc to occur in such a cable without involving the cpc.  Leakage to the cpc of 30mA will operate the RCD in 40mSecs.  Consider this against the ~ 2 amps and uncertain time of the AFFD; much more energy will be delivered into the fauklt before the AFDD operates.  At less than 2 amps it won't operate anyway.


    2). The various manufacturers are all headquartered outside the UK.  They only encounter BS 6004 cables in the UK sector of their market, a relatively small percentage of the global market.  Their various diagrams and videos of parallel arcs all illustrate phase to neutral faults in "conventional" (to them) wiring installations. None of these show a BS 6004-type cpc positioned between the conductors with an RCD upstream.  When they occasionally think of a ring circuit, they think of "conventional" circular cable types or conduit singles - a different situation. In my opinion, in the UK domestic BS 6004 situation, the AFDD adds no additional fire safety.


    What comes next?  It's already here: the single-module RCBO/AFDD.  If AFDDS are mandated in the UK, these RCBO/AFDDs will be installed by the tens of thousands in the years ahead. Now consider the unqualified householder on a Friday night bank holiday weekend, (Christmas Eve?) and one of these things trips......what tripped it?  Overcurrent?  Earth leakage? Arc fault? Nuisance trip? What do all these green, red, yellow and steady/flashing LEDs mean?  What is this "test" button for?  What chance has the poor householder got of restoring power safely?


    As you may have gathered, I think we are being sold a pup with these things for the UK.  I certainly won't be retrofitting any.

    Regards,

              Colin.



     


     

Children
No Data