This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

AFDDs - are they sensitive to upstream arcing?

It's occurred to me that if AFDDs work by spotting distortion in the a.c. current waveform that's passing through the device, then they're likely to see the same effect if series arcing is occurring upstream (with a decent sized load downstream).


If that's the case a decent DNO's crackle could trip out a significant number of final circuits if they happened to be loaded at the time.


Or are AFDDs cleverer than that? (e.g. do they look for an undistorted incoming voltage as well as a distorted current?)


As many of the dimming and flickering I've seen has been down to DNO loose connections, there could be a lot of nuisance tripping with these new devices if my worry is correct.


  - Andy.
Parents
  • Hi Andy, also RCDs have also been known for sometime to offer protection against upstream arcing and loose connections!

    I'm not sure RCDs offer reliable 'protection' from upstream arcing - I think it's more likely that the loose connection causes a temporary voltage rise on the N which in turn increases the leakage through a grumbling high resistance N-PE fault that in normal circumstances donesn't pass quite enough current to trip the RCD. I suspect that in the vast majority of cases an RCD wouldn't trip on an upstream arc.


        - Andy.
Reply
  • Hi Andy, also RCDs have also been known for sometime to offer protection against upstream arcing and loose connections!

    I'm not sure RCDs offer reliable 'protection' from upstream arcing - I think it's more likely that the loose connection causes a temporary voltage rise on the N which in turn increases the leakage through a grumbling high resistance N-PE fault that in normal circumstances donesn't pass quite enough current to trip the RCD. I suspect that in the vast majority of cases an RCD wouldn't trip on an upstream arc.


        - Andy.
Children
No Data