This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

AMD 2 - insulation testing

Looks like the DPC has made a bit of a change about insulation testing where some devices might be vulnerable to a 500V test voltage or distort the results. Previously we were allowed to either disconnect the item concerned (or do the test prior to initial connection) OR carry out a 250V test (with a 1MΩ limit to meet).


As I read it, a full 500V test will soon be required prior to connection of such equipment PLUS an additional 250V test (with a 1MΩ limit to meet) will be required after it is connected.


I can see the sense in that, in that it doesn't 'excuse' the rest of the circuit from a full 500V test, but I'm slightly uneasy about some equipment not being happy with a relatively long duration 250V d.c. test L&N - PE - especially if it has to meet a 1MΩ limit. Does anyone have any thoughts on that?


All strictly speaking for an initial verification - for a periodic we still seem to have the flexibility of choosing 'appropriate' tests (however that's going to be interpreted...).


Seems it's going to be a bit of extra work, especially if you've a house full of USB power sockets....


   - Andy.
Parents
  • Note that the insulation resistance test as described in BS 7671 (643.3.2) is meant to be applied to the assembled installation, i.e .... "the main switch board and each distribution circuit tested separately, with all its final circuits connected but with current-using equipment disconnected," ......

    And then confused and bemuddled by model generic schedule of test results asking for insulation resistance results per outgoing circuit.

     
    Perhaps we need to question just what it is we want to achieve.

    +1 for that!


       - Andy.
Reply
  • Note that the insulation resistance test as described in BS 7671 (643.3.2) is meant to be applied to the assembled installation, i.e .... "the main switch board and each distribution circuit tested separately, with all its final circuits connected but with current-using equipment disconnected," ......

    And then confused and bemuddled by model generic schedule of test results asking for insulation resistance results per outgoing circuit.

     
    Perhaps we need to question just what it is we want to achieve.

    +1 for that!


       - Andy.
Children
No Data