This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Koi Pond S.W.A Supply.

The curtains open to reveal a tripped R.C.D. reported. The underground S.W.A supplies Koi Carp pond equipment such as water pumps, a U.V. unit and other stuff. Water ingress me thinks. The home owner says that the R.C.D. will not reset even with repeated tries.


I arrive to find that the owner has eventually got the R.C.D. to turn on.


Fault finding starts. The first section of S.W.A. cable reveals an insulation resistance of 0.03 Meg Ohms L to E. N to E o.k. 


The owner wants the faulty S.W.A to be reconnected. I say that I can not as the supply is unreliable and maybe dangerous. I refuse to reconnect it. I install a temporary supply for the pond to keep it airated and to prevent freezing. It is cold here.


The faulty section of S.W.A. cable runs to a socket at a shed  before continuing to the pond. I seem to recall in my dreams that the faulty S.W.A. cable is a 4 core type.


Do I use the 4th unused core as a new L if it tests O.K? YOUR THOUGHTS PLEASE.


P.S. Fencers have replaced an old fence with new posts, that is more than likely the cause of the damage to the cable.


Z.
Parents
  • You may reveal jacket damage by looking for impedance from the SWA armour to true terra-firma. If that is less than a few megs then it is likely. However, on its own a damp armour is not a reason to condemn a installation - surprisingly many installations are scuffed on installation and work OK for years.


    By all means use the existing core (or even god forbid swap the L and N ) to prove the point and get it going and keep the fish alive until better weather. If there is underground damage however, it is likely to get worse and eventually fail whatever you do, as water seeps into places it should not. However if the armour is complete from end to end it is unlikely to pose a serious risk while it fails.


    If you think the customer is the type to not get you back to change the SWA in a sensible time frame, do not offer this as an option.

    Mike.

Reply
  • You may reveal jacket damage by looking for impedance from the SWA armour to true terra-firma. If that is less than a few megs then it is likely. However, on its own a damp armour is not a reason to condemn a installation - surprisingly many installations are scuffed on installation and work OK for years.


    By all means use the existing core (or even god forbid swap the L and N ) to prove the point and get it going and keep the fish alive until better weather. If there is underground damage however, it is likely to get worse and eventually fail whatever you do, as water seeps into places it should not. However if the armour is complete from end to end it is unlikely to pose a serious risk while it fails.


    If you think the customer is the type to not get you back to change the SWA in a sensible time frame, do not offer this as an option.

    Mike.

Children
No Data