mapj1:
There is a general problem of letting software people write software for controls, in that the result is typically just awful. For some reason working with computers for a long time seems to addle the brain, and leave people with a very odd sense of what type and layout of control is intuitive.
(it also affects the speech centres, folk talking about MMI (Man Machine Interface) or ergonomics, or 'human factors' (unless you make equipment for aliens there are no other factors), have probably passed the point of no return.)
If anyone has ever used the manual controls on a Votsch lab oven they will understand. Siemens mobile phones made the same mistake.
Where are they now ?
To be successful the controls on any piece of equipment need to be quite intuitive- and that means being able to go back when you have made an error, increasing things being clockwise, or perhaps up, and to have some sort of overview of what has been programmed - a simple clock face with segments in different shades and a key showing that pale is set to 20 degrees, and dark is 15 or whatever is a lot simpler than a line of semicolons and << >> signs.
Anything requiring a handbook of more than one sheet of paper has probably already failed, and will not be understood or used correctly once the enthusiastic fool who fitted it has left the property.
Mike.
A superb observation Mike! Copy it to an email and send it to every manufacturer in the country, I think it would put Britain back on the map!
Did you know, did you know that some storage heaters do not work properly if they sense a draught of air coming under a door?
There is a general problem of letting software people write software for controls, in that the result is typically just awful.
folk talking about MMI (Man Machine Interface) or ergonomics, or 'human factors' (unless you make equipment for aliens there are no other factors)
kfh:
On a slightly different but related topic I occasionally drive my daughters BMW Mini, I have yet to work out how to turn the radio off!
It may not be possible.
My 15 y.o. M-B has a "COMAND" system which includes satnav, phone, radio, TV, reversing camera, etc. It is either all on or all off. If one does not want to listen to anything, there is the option of the "mute" button.
lyledunn:mapj1:
There is a general problem of letting software people write software for controls, in that the result is typically just awful. For some reason working with computers for a long time seems to addle the brain, and leave people with a very odd sense of what type and layout of control is intuitive.
(it also affects the speech centres, folk talking about MMI (Man Machine Interface) or ergonomics, or 'human factors' (unless you make equipment for aliens there are no other factors), have probably passed the point of no return.)
If anyone has ever used the manual controls on a Votsch lab oven they will understand. Siemens mobile phones made the same mistake.
Where are they now ?
To be successful the controls on any piece of equipment need to be quite intuitive- and that means being able to go back when you have made an error, increasing things being clockwise, or perhaps up, and to have some sort of overview of what has been programmed - a simple clock face with segments in different shades and a key showing that pale is set to 20 degrees, and dark is 15 or whatever is a lot simpler than a line of semicolons and << >> signs.
Anything requiring a handbook of more than one sheet of paper has probably already failed, and will not be understood or used correctly once the enthusiastic fool who fitted it has left the property.
Mike.
A superb observation Mike! Copy it to an email and send it to every manufacturer in the country, I think it would put Britain back on the map!
Yes they use the term "Comfort On" for On.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site