(i) serious injury to, or loss of, human life; or
(ii) any other intolerable risk of loss.
Note: In order to determine whether a risk is intolerable, a discussion will need to take place between the designer, installer and any other relevant parties, such as the installation owner and/or end-user. The following factors should be taken into consideration:
(i) the magnitude of financial loss including the loss of data or equipment;
(ii) the chance of a transient overvoltage occurring; and
(iii) the cost of providing protection.
It really is quite simple: cost of protection < cost of loss x chance of loss. Anywhere!
whjohnson:
I have given up trying to access it, never mind find it.
They don't make it easy to comment do they? I wonder why?
Does this make it any easier? https://standardsdevelopment.bsigroup.com/projects/2019-02917#/section
(although you still need to create and account/login before you can access the details)
- Andy.
AJJewsbury:
Reading through some of the comments on AFDDs is interesting. They're not all completely opposed (although probably 95-ish percent are). A number ask for a higher limit than 32A - some suggest limiting the requirement to new builds or new circuits or that lighting circuits be included.
One comment about the wider than intended scope of the regulation got me thinking ... where will I find an AFDD for my 8V transformer driven door bell circuit? (After all, it is a single-phase AC final circuit supplying fixed current-using equipment with a rated current not exceeding 32A...)
- Andy.
Door bell transformers are bombproof Andy.
Z.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site