AJJewsbury:Who would keep such reports - there's not a statutory duty to report such failures.
If there was no evidence of problems why did JPEL think is necessary to delete the PVC (H05VV-F) option?
- Andy.
Round in circles I think here. I've had experience of water migration through PVC, I've pointed to some information from a cable manufacturer who says the same thing.
Whilst I wasn't involved in producing Section 721 for the 17th Edition, I do know that it arrived in HD prior to it being included in 17th Edition - along with harmonization work of the respective cable standards which we now call EN 50525.
You asked about "reports" - they won't exist for this, because there's nothing official. If a lead fails "PAT test" or similar, it's replaced, not reported.
AJJewsbury:Who would keep such reports - there's not a statutory duty to report such failures.
If there was no evidence of problems why did JPEL think is necessary to delete the PVC (H05VV-F) option?
- Andy.
Round in circles I think here. I've had experience of water migration through PVC, I've pointed to some information from a cable manufacturer who says the same thing.
Whilst I wasn't involved in producing Section 721 for the 17th Edition, I do know that it arrived in HD prior to it being included in 17th Edition - along with harmonization work of the respective cable standards which we now call EN 50525.
You asked about "reports" - they won't exist for this, because there's nothing official. If a lead fails "PAT test" or similar, it's replaced, not reported.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site