This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

£30k fine for landlords who do not provide a valid EICR for their rental properties

Is this actually true or is it some estate agent cashing in on lost income?

The reason why I ask, what appears to be a daft question, is that a friend has just received notification from the estate agent who sold the property 15 years ago that their property, which is now being rented, must be inspected and tested for compliance to 18th ed. Not that I was unaware of this requirement!

I just thought the £30k punishment for disobedience was a little steep. Or maybe  'bribery and corruption' or  'threatening behaviour' was the new Inspection and testing idiom.?

Legh
Parents
  • One imagines the full wack fine would only be levied in cases of blatant and repeated disregard for the rules.

    Like all things local authority related it is more likely to start with a strongly worded letter asking you to do something within 14 days or suffer another letter.

    Someone making reasonable efforts to comply but taking a little extra time to get things tested or repaired or whatever  will not be subject to this.

    This is much the same in all levels of the law actually - the maximum penalty is rarely handed down, as it is just that a maximum.

    Mike.


Reply
  • One imagines the full wack fine would only be levied in cases of blatant and repeated disregard for the rules.

    Like all things local authority related it is more likely to start with a strongly worded letter asking you to do something within 14 days or suffer another letter.

    Someone making reasonable efforts to comply but taking a little extra time to get things tested or repaired or whatever  will not be subject to this.

    This is much the same in all levels of the law actually - the maximum penalty is rarely handed down, as it is just that a maximum.

    Mike.


Children
No Data