Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 46 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 6041 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

£30k fine for landlords who do not provide a valid EICR for their rental properties

Legh Richardson
Is this actually true or is it some estate agent cashing in on lost income?

The reason why I ask, what appears to be a daft question, is that a friend has just received notification from the estate agent who sold the property 15 years ago that their property, which is now being rented, must be inspected and tested for compliance to 18th ed. Not that I was unaware of this requirement!

I just thought the £30k punishment for disobedience was a little steep. Or maybe  'bribery and corruption' or  'threatening behaviour' was the new Inspection and testing idiom.?

Legh
Parents
  • 0
    I'm going to use the C-word again. It's all a matter of contract. FI should be pretty unusual. So if you have a circuit which is not labelled, I don't think that you could be expected to establish what it supplies; but of course that should not occur!


    This is where JP's standard spec. is useful - the customer knows what is and is not included.


    Rectifying minor faults as you go along is just good practice. You wouldn't fail an installation because the tails are loose at the main switch - the very act of checking for tightness means that they get tightened.


    I think also good to let the customer know that you have fixed a few little things, but no extra charge. That gets you back in 5 years. ?
Reply
  • 0
    I'm going to use the C-word again. It's all a matter of contract. FI should be pretty unusual. So if you have a circuit which is not labelled, I don't think that you could be expected to establish what it supplies; but of course that should not occur!


    This is where JP's standard spec. is useful - the customer knows what is and is not included.


    Rectifying minor faults as you go along is just good practice. You wouldn't fail an installation because the tails are loose at the main switch - the very act of checking for tightness means that they get tightened.


    I think also good to let the customer know that you have fixed a few little things, but no extra charge. That gets you back in 5 years. ?
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines