This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

£30k fine for landlords who do not provide a valid EICR for their rental properties

Is this actually true or is it some estate agent cashing in on lost income?

The reason why I ask, what appears to be a daft question, is that a friend has just received notification from the estate agent who sold the property 15 years ago that their property, which is now being rented, must be inspected and tested for compliance to 18th ed. Not that I was unaware of this requirement!

I just thought the £30k punishment for disobedience was a little steep. Or maybe  'bribery and corruption' or  'threatening behaviour' was the new Inspection and testing idiom.?

Legh
Parents
  • Sorry Zoom I do not agree.

    Where a genuine F1 applies it could be something that is a C1 or a C2 lurking there and as such we`d condem.

    However it could be a C3 or even no code at all.

    Until it is investigated and therefore determined we must make it condemable. We can`t give it a pass (yet) or a fail (yet) we can only record a potential unsatisfactory as a (assumed) unstisfactory. Therefore F1 unstaisfactory
Reply
  • Sorry Zoom I do not agree.

    Where a genuine F1 applies it could be something that is a C1 or a C2 lurking there and as such we`d condem.

    However it could be a C3 or even no code at all.

    Until it is investigated and therefore determined we must make it condemable. We can`t give it a pass (yet) or a fail (yet) we can only record a potential unsatisfactory as a (assumed) unstisfactory. Therefore F1 unstaisfactory
Children
No Data