Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 16 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 2106 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Testing if supplementary bonding is required.

MrJack96
I have read some bits stating we can measure between the two metallic parts in question and referring to the formula 


50/ia will give you the resistance needed to keep touch voltage to less than 50v 


my questions can we do the same test to determine if the part has a high enough resistance to not require bonding and what sort of figures we should look for?
Parents
  • 0
    Am I right in saying in both cases (broken PEN)the installation should be safe only considering all bonding requirements have been met? The only issue is outside the Equipitential zone? That’s why in some cases it’s not a good idea to bond outside taps due to the fact if the Met was at 230v within the installation the tap would then be at the same potential meaning the folk who ends up touching this will be in a dangerous scenario?
Reply
  • 0
    Am I right in saying in both cases (broken PEN)the installation should be safe only considering all bonding requirements have been met? The only issue is outside the Equipitential zone? That’s why in some cases it’s not a good idea to bond outside taps due to the fact if the Met was at 230v within the installation the tap would then be at the same potential meaning the folk who ends up touching this will be in a dangerous scenario?
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines