Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 16 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 2113 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Testing if supplementary bonding is required.

MrJack96
I have read some bits stating we can measure between the two metallic parts in question and referring to the formula 


50/ia will give you the resistance needed to keep touch voltage to less than 50v 


my questions can we do the same test to determine if the part has a high enough resistance to not require bonding and what sort of figures we should look for?
Parents
  • 0
    AJJewsbury:

    We still use the word equipotential - e.g. in reg 411.3.1.2 - although I agree it's not a good description - being more of a zone of reduced or perhaps minimised potential differences rather a zone of truly equal potentials.


    Well, we are not theoretical physicists, so some tolerance is allowed. Even then, it's relative potential rather than absolute. +/- 25 V?


Reply
  • 0
    AJJewsbury:

    We still use the word equipotential - e.g. in reg 411.3.1.2 - although I agree it's not a good description - being more of a zone of reduced or perhaps minimised potential differences rather a zone of truly equal potentials.


    Well, we are not theoretical physicists, so some tolerance is allowed. Even then, it's relative potential rather than absolute. +/- 25 V?


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines