The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 30 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 18595 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Multiple circuits in a single MCB/RCBO

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Having undertaken some inspections recently I'm finding a lot of older installations with multiple circuits within a single RCBO. Example being 2 light circuits (Upstairs/downstairs) being added to a single B6 RCBO.

The circuit design covers single pendants in each room and some downlights in the kitchen. The majority of bulbs are LED so from a risk point of view would this be unlikely to exceed 6amps. From the EICR however would this be considered C3 in peoples opinions due to risk level with a potential of splitting to separate RCBO's, or should this be C2 as there are technically 2 circuits fed from a single MCB?


Likewise the same installation has a 32amp MCB (RCD protected) supplying a ring final circuit downstairs. When work has been undertaken in the past, an additional radial circuit has been added to the same MCB in 2.5mm T&E. My view on this is that this instantly requires a C2 coding, as the radial circuit feeds multiple sockets (and there is no Fused spur within the radial line) it is not rated for the potential draw and the 32amp breaker will not trip with the overload of the radial line.


There are no spare ways in the board, so am I correct in claiming this would require a new replacement board to accommodate and separate the circuits? Would this be different if the radial only served a single double socket for ease of the wiring?


There appears to be a lot of confusion on when/if its acceptable to add radials to an existing breaker and I wondered if there was any clarity, given that these circuit amendments are historic and retrospective changing to meet current regulations is not essential providing it met previous regulations.


Many thanks

David
Parents
  • 0
    What would you do if you saw multiple radials , each feeding one twin socket and connected at the origin to one 32A MCB or RCBO?


    Not elegant, most of us would not do it. But what danger is there? Overload protected (by vertue of 2 x 13A plugtop fiuses max) , Short cvircuit and earth fault addressed.


    2, 3 or 4 rings in one circuit way on the fuseboard with or without a spur of one twin socket att the origin. Again what danger if terminations are electrically and mechanically sound? 


    Again, would we do it - no. could we condemn it?
Reply
  • 0
    What would you do if you saw multiple radials , each feeding one twin socket and connected at the origin to one 32A MCB or RCBO?


    Not elegant, most of us would not do it. But what danger is there? Overload protected (by vertue of 2 x 13A plugtop fiuses max) , Short cvircuit and earth fault addressed.


    2, 3 or 4 rings in one circuit way on the fuseboard with or without a spur of one twin socket att the origin. Again what danger if terminations are electrically and mechanically sound? 


    Again, would we do it - no. could we condemn it?
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines