Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 817 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

No main switch

lyledunn
In an effort to separate a new EV installation from the existing installation, it is intended to fit Henley blocks and tail off to a new consumer unit. There are up to twenty similar installations all domestic. The contractor has asked my opinion on his intention as the existing installations have only one consumer unit which, of course, provides a single main switch in compliance with 462.1.201. With his proposal there will be two means of isolation, one in each of the consumer units. This is very common practice in this neck of the woods so ordinarily there would be no concerns raised. However, there is particular scrutiny of EV installations so he is keen to ensure that 7671 is complied with in full. 

There is no space for a separate isolator. My own view is that 462.1.201 does not necessarily demand a single means of isolation but I would appreciate the opinion of others. Even if there was a non-compliance, I do believe that the separate arrangement proposed is a much better alternative.

Parents
  • 0
    In the old days, before the advent of 4-pole REC isolators, it was usual to have two separate CUs (and hence isolation) for the 24-hour and off-peak systems - the argument being they were in effect two different installations within the same building - but that really wasn't ideal for the homeowner hunting for the 'main switch' in an emergency.


    It's also common to have two (or more) separate means of isolation where there are multiple sources of supply (e.g. PV systems).


    My reading of the regs is that the intent is to have single means of isolation where at all possible, but labelling might suffice in other cases.


    How much space is there? If there's room for a pair of Henleys there might be room for some kind of isolator that could feed 2x 25mm²...


        - Andy.
Reply
  • 0
    In the old days, before the advent of 4-pole REC isolators, it was usual to have two separate CUs (and hence isolation) for the 24-hour and off-peak systems - the argument being they were in effect two different installations within the same building - but that really wasn't ideal for the homeowner hunting for the 'main switch' in an emergency.


    It's also common to have two (or more) separate means of isolation where there are multiple sources of supply (e.g. PV systems).


    My reading of the regs is that the intent is to have single means of isolation where at all possible, but labelling might suffice in other cases.


    How much space is there? If there's room for a pair of Henleys there might be room for some kind of isolator that could feed 2x 25mm²...


        - Andy.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines