This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

How closely does BS 7671 track IEC 60364?

I understand that BS 7671 is notionally derived from IEC 60364, but how closely does it actually track it? The Wikipedia page for IEC 60364 shows that it has many of the same chapters, although for example some of the part 7 sections are missing / different.


So for example if I looked at section 521 say in both standards, would I expect to see the exact same sequence of 521.x.y.z's (apart from the occasional .20x) with exactly the same content?


Also, how are amendments handled? E.g. for the proposed Amendment 2 changes, are these things that have already been added to IEC 60364 (such as part 8) and are now migrating into BS 7671? Plus I guess some things that the IET has proposed on their own? For the latter, will they be added unilaterally to BS 7671 then might get backported to to IEC 60364 at some point in the future if the IEC approve? And if they don't approve, we just live with the divergence?
Parents
  • The picture is slightly more complicated than considering IEC 60364 series.


    Because of BSI's membership of CENELEC, BS 7671 must align with HD 60364-series.


    A HD (Harmonized Document) is produced in the same way as an EN (Euro Norm).
    • In the case of an EN, it is taken verbatim into national standards - so BS EN 62368-1 should be identical to VDE EN 62368-1. Any national variations in an EN are agreed before the EN is published. We call those "SNCs", or "Special National Conditions".

    • In the case of HDs, the technical intent of the HD must be adopted by national standards, but the actual wording and additional national requirements can be added. However, if a national standard does not want to adopt the technical intent of a particular requirement in the HD, in the same way SNCs are agreed before the HD is published.


    In aligning with HD 60364, the provisions in BS 7671 must adopt the minimum technical intent of the relevant parts of the standard.

    Occasionally, the wording of requirements in "international English" doesn't really lend itself to direct implementation in BS 7671 (yes, it really can get more confusing that it is already), so even where the requirements of a Regulation are the same, the wording may well be slightly different in BS 7671.


    So where does IEC 60364 series fit in with that? Well, that's published in IEC (the electrotechnical side of ISO). Parts of IEC 60364 may be started by IEC project work, or offered up from CENELEC if CENELEC see the need to develop a new part first - however, these days usually CENELEC members would begin an IEC project first, and then CENELEC will decide whether to adopt that part. National variations are agreed when IEC documents are being prepared and commented on - in IEC these are termed "SCNs" (In Some Countries Notes)


    When a part of IEC 60364 is updated, CENELEC committees decide whether to adopt that amendment (a process called "parallel vote"), or whether amendments are needed for CENELEC countries, and at this point HD 60364-x-yyy might differ slightly from IEC 60364-x-yyy. SCNs are transposed to SNCs at this point also, and reaffirmed.


    So occasionally, you will see new technical intent in BS 7671 first, before it is adopted internationally, and at other times new intent will come from CENELEC and/or IEC.



    BSI do publish the international standards for public comment in the same way as BS 7671, before they get adopted, so it's all an open process, even if it seems a bit daunting at first after reading my missive above in this post.

Reply
  • The picture is slightly more complicated than considering IEC 60364 series.


    Because of BSI's membership of CENELEC, BS 7671 must align with HD 60364-series.


    A HD (Harmonized Document) is produced in the same way as an EN (Euro Norm).
    • In the case of an EN, it is taken verbatim into national standards - so BS EN 62368-1 should be identical to VDE EN 62368-1. Any national variations in an EN are agreed before the EN is published. We call those "SNCs", or "Special National Conditions".

    • In the case of HDs, the technical intent of the HD must be adopted by national standards, but the actual wording and additional national requirements can be added. However, if a national standard does not want to adopt the technical intent of a particular requirement in the HD, in the same way SNCs are agreed before the HD is published.


    In aligning with HD 60364, the provisions in BS 7671 must adopt the minimum technical intent of the relevant parts of the standard.

    Occasionally, the wording of requirements in "international English" doesn't really lend itself to direct implementation in BS 7671 (yes, it really can get more confusing that it is already), so even where the requirements of a Regulation are the same, the wording may well be slightly different in BS 7671.


    So where does IEC 60364 series fit in with that? Well, that's published in IEC (the electrotechnical side of ISO). Parts of IEC 60364 may be started by IEC project work, or offered up from CENELEC if CENELEC see the need to develop a new part first - however, these days usually CENELEC members would begin an IEC project first, and then CENELEC will decide whether to adopt that part. National variations are agreed when IEC documents are being prepared and commented on - in IEC these are termed "SCNs" (In Some Countries Notes)


    When a part of IEC 60364 is updated, CENELEC committees decide whether to adopt that amendment (a process called "parallel vote"), or whether amendments are needed for CENELEC countries, and at this point HD 60364-x-yyy might differ slightly from IEC 60364-x-yyy. SCNs are transposed to SNCs at this point also, and reaffirmed.


    So occasionally, you will see new technical intent in BS 7671 first, before it is adopted internationally, and at other times new intent will come from CENELEC and/or IEC.



    BSI do publish the international standards for public comment in the same way as BS 7671, before they get adopted, so it's all an open process, even if it seems a bit daunting at first after reading my missive above in this post.

Children
No Data