perspicacious:
I didn't want to spoil the terminal rating topic on a RFC by reminding readers of content of 433.1.204 regarding CCC of 20 A being satisfactory.....
So, with this in mind, would a 20 A JB attract any coding on an EICR if found on a 32 A RFC?
Regards
BAD
Interesting ... 433.1.204 relates only to the current carrying capacity of the cable and not accessories (except being "permissive" for BS 1363 accessories as we discussed previously) ... which brings an interesting dimension to the tale, but I think that's now getting very picky ... it will be interesting to see what others think about the 20 A JB question.
perspicacious:
I didn't want to spoil the terminal rating topic on a RFC by reminding readers of content of 433.1.204 regarding CCC of 20 A being satisfactory.....
So, with this in mind, would a 20 A JB attract any coding on an EICR if found on a 32 A RFC?
Regards
BAD
Interesting ... 433.1.204 relates only to the current carrying capacity of the cable and not accessories (except being "permissive" for BS 1363 accessories as we discussed previously) ... which brings an interesting dimension to the tale, but I think that's now getting very picky ... it will be interesting to see what others think about the 20 A JB question.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site