Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 12 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1665 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Temporary extension leads in Healthcare Environment for Short Power Shutdowns

Adrian B
Quick question which hopefully somebody may be able to help with:


I have a hospital tower block with 2 rising busbars, east and west.  I need to shut down the East busbar to carry out modification works to the East side LV Switch Panel.

5 years ago, the Trust (Hospital) did this exact same procedure and the electrical contractor at the time supplied dozens of extension leads to enable more essential (but not life critical) power supplies to be kept up and running for a period of half a day during the panel shut down.  The contractor also provided temporary lighting where necessary (i.e. festoon type + emergency fittings).

5 years later (now) the contractor is suggesting that it is against regulations to provide temporary extension leads and a fire risk.  I understand that a risk assessment needs to be carried out and agreed with the Trust to carry these works out, but, I personally cannot find any mention of this being unacceptable within regulations.

Can anyone advise if this is the case?

Thanks in advance for any response


Regards

Adrian
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    davezawadi (David Stone):

    I see no additional fire risk either. The idea that correctly loaded cables are a fire risk is in cloud cuckoo land as usual. There will be an additional trip hazard (slight), but A&E is probably only yards away and some tape and warning notices should sort the problem. Someone will suggest the nurses wear hard hats next!


    I'd hesitate to go that far, David - the hazards of temporary supply in that kind of emergency situation would be quite real  - again, more so from a fire perspective than an electrocution risk


    Regards


    OMS


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    davezawadi (David Stone):

    I see no additional fire risk either. The idea that correctly loaded cables are a fire risk is in cloud cuckoo land as usual. There will be an additional trip hazard (slight), but A&E is probably only yards away and some tape and warning notices should sort the problem. Someone will suggest the nurses wear hard hats next!


    I'd hesitate to go that far, David - the hazards of temporary supply in that kind of emergency situation would be quite real  - again, more so from a fire perspective than an electrocution risk


    Regards


    OMS


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines