Chris Pearson:Zoomup:davezawadi (David Stone):
What is wrong with the B32 and two 2.5s Sparkingchip? Overload is impossible as I'm sure you realise? Ring connection is not necessary Chris, although it doesn't hurt and satidfies the overload point which worries some people. I expect only 1 heater at a time, but both would work safely. However it would be easier to have a Bath/Sink switch and just use the existing 2.5 cable. Job done. Local isolation/switching on/off is not necessary, although you may find it convenient, along with a timer. Ensure no non-return valves have been fitted anywhere back to the water main.If the B32 trips off you have lost all heating. With two B16s and two separate circuits you have a more reliable system.
I disagree. You have a less reliable system, because the chance of at least one circuit failing is doubled.
What you have is redundancy so that in the event of failure, only half the heating is lost.
I don't quite understand your logic Chris. With just one B32 M.C.B. if one element becomes faulty and trips the M.C.B. you have lost both elements for heating. With two separate supplies, via two 16 Amp M.C.B.s and supply circuits there is more inbuilt reliability. If one fails the other can still be used.
Z.
Chris Pearson:Zoomup:davezawadi (David Stone):
What is wrong with the B32 and two 2.5s Sparkingchip? Overload is impossible as I'm sure you realise? Ring connection is not necessary Chris, although it doesn't hurt and satidfies the overload point which worries some people. I expect only 1 heater at a time, but both would work safely. However it would be easier to have a Bath/Sink switch and just use the existing 2.5 cable. Job done. Local isolation/switching on/off is not necessary, although you may find it convenient, along with a timer. Ensure no non-return valves have been fitted anywhere back to the water main.If the B32 trips off you have lost all heating. With two B16s and two separate circuits you have a more reliable system.
I disagree. You have a less reliable system, because the chance of at least one circuit failing is doubled.
What you have is redundancy so that in the event of failure, only half the heating is lost.
I don't quite understand your logic Chris. With just one B32 M.C.B. if one element becomes faulty and trips the M.C.B. you have lost both elements for heating. With two separate supplies, via two 16 Amp M.C.B.s and supply circuits there is more inbuilt reliability. If one fails the other can still be used.
Z.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site