GTB:
Looking at the responses, diffrent people have diffrent views or their interpretation of a word/words is diffrent from others.
Leading engineering technology often and does lead time wise the standard/s for that item and to me ultimately down to the person/s that are defined as the designer, installer and inspector along with the proper defined contract arrangement between the purchaser of that install/inspection and the provider.
If people believe that the actions they take are appropriate and compliant with the appropriate statute legislation then great, job done.
If there is a fire, electric shock, explosion then the people involved will then have to demonstrate that their action/s were not a root cause leading to the event or a major contributor.
Or if its a loss of revenue/service on the purchasers side then a civil claim against those parties would also have to be defended.
I think this thread is getting to the end of the road, psychicwarrier, why not just do whatever you want and believe to be correct, and if there is ever a incident with your work Im sure you will be able to explain your actions were just and appropriate and didnt cause the fatality or building to burn down.
GTB
Thank you for the assesment of this thread. Others might still wish to contribute. To me you have missed the point, but you may be correct in that it is at an end for the point I was trying to make (not very wellperhaps). :-)
GTB:
Looking at the responses, diffrent people have diffrent views or their interpretation of a word/words is diffrent from others.
Leading engineering technology often and does lead time wise the standard/s for that item and to me ultimately down to the person/s that are defined as the designer, installer and inspector along with the proper defined contract arrangement between the purchaser of that install/inspection and the provider.
If people believe that the actions they take are appropriate and compliant with the appropriate statute legislation then great, job done.
If there is a fire, electric shock, explosion then the people involved will then have to demonstrate that their action/s were not a root cause leading to the event or a major contributor.
Or if its a loss of revenue/service on the purchasers side then a civil claim against those parties would also have to be defended.
I think this thread is getting to the end of the road, psychicwarrier, why not just do whatever you want and believe to be correct, and if there is ever a incident with your work Im sure you will be able to explain your actions were just and appropriate and didnt cause the fatality or building to burn down.
GTB
Thank you for the assesment of this thread. Others might still wish to contribute. To me you have missed the point, but you may be correct in that it is at an end for the point I was trying to make (not very wellperhaps). :-)
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site