This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

531.3.1.202

"It is not permissible  to introduce an external connection for the purpose of intentionally creating a residual current to trip an RCD."


What problems, hazard or danger will ignoring this regulation create?


Z.
Parents
  • gkenyon:
    Zoomup:
    gkenyon:

    Such a current would be applied downstream of the RCD. If the RCD trips, or is used as a point of isolation, and the arrangement tries to apply current, you are left with a current which might have nowhere to go except the person to whom additional protection is being offered, or whom the isolation was intended to protect.


    Yeh but it is such a tiny current originated through a big, erm, high value resistor.


    Z.




    It only takes a tiny current ... we are discussing mA. What is the safeguard if the resistor fails?




    It tends to burn out and go open circuit in my experience of R.C.D. and R.C.B.O. devices.


    Z.


Reply
  • gkenyon:
    Zoomup:
    gkenyon:

    Such a current would be applied downstream of the RCD. If the RCD trips, or is used as a point of isolation, and the arrangement tries to apply current, you are left with a current which might have nowhere to go except the person to whom additional protection is being offered, or whom the isolation was intended to protect.


    Yeh but it is such a tiny current originated through a big, erm, high value resistor.


    Z.




    It only takes a tiny current ... we are discussing mA. What is the safeguard if the resistor fails?




    It tends to burn out and go open circuit in my experience of R.C.D. and R.C.B.O. devices.


    Z.


Children
No Data