This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EICR Remedial Work

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi, my first post, I wondered if I could get some advice from the community regarding a failed EICR report and the subsequent remedial works.

Me letting agent appointed a local electrical firm to conduct an EICR report on my flat before new tenants moved in. The timescale was tight since the new tenants were due to move in on the 1st Feb.


The flat is a purpose-built flat constructed in 2005 so id be surprised if the electrics were too far out of spec.


The report came back as failed due to the following points:


1 No Bonding, substantial metal pipework in property

8 Fan is not low voltage in bathroom, and is in zone 2


the quotation for the remedial work was to install 100mm bonding from the consumer unit to the stop cock and replace the extractor with an extra low voltage fan and controller.

"estimate of a morning for 2 which hopefully will be less, however the route is not particularly easy" - £630 inc VAT.


the quote sounded high for a mornings work but due to time constraints i had to agree.


the final invoice came back as 28 hours work, £1399...  so that's 28 hours work to run about 6metres of earth bonding and replace the bathroom fan when the initial quote was a morning's work for £630.


So obviously I've questioned this and after doing some digging, I found that firstly 230v fans are allowed in zone 2, and not all incoming water pipes need to be bonded if there is plastic in the incoming supply..


I'll upload screenshots of the paper work and photos of the job, but any advice would be greatly appreciated!

fef58217ef06411ab3fcb5e012db7a01-huge-quotation.png



b2dc16ff7b1f285e61c95ea8dd664268-huge-eicr-report.png


Parents
  • Agreed, years ago I pointed that one out to IEE as it was then. I suggested that if I had a bath on extended legs (not impossible) then heights for zones should be referenced from bath floor level rather than the floor the bath was sat on. But my point was not taken and room floor level won.

    PS if a fan is mounted on or below the ceiling then the height is to the bit of fan you can touch, not the ceiling its mounted under I would think
Reply
  • Agreed, years ago I pointed that one out to IEE as it was then. I suggested that if I had a bath on extended legs (not impossible) then heights for zones should be referenced from bath floor level rather than the floor the bath was sat on. But my point was not taken and room floor level won.

    PS if a fan is mounted on or below the ceiling then the height is to the bit of fan you can touch, not the ceiling its mounted under I would think
Children
No Data