This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

bonding a short section of water supply pipe

In a victorian terrace house, a lead water supply pipe enters the damp cellar, runs about a meter along the wall to the main brass stopcock, then converts to plastic pipe before exiting the cellar to the rest of the house (which is likely to be a mixture of copper and plastic). The stopcock is a couple of feet away from the CU. Should the supply pipe be bonded? My feeling is no, but I'd be interested in other opinions.


While I'm on the subject, a more general question. Why must any bonding be done after the main stopcock? For example where the supply tees off immediately after the stopcock, is it better to bond one of the tees, or bond just before the stopcock? Where there is a long run of supply pipe before the stopcock, is it better to bond after, with a long MPBC run back to the MET, or bond it near the MET even where that's before the stopcock?
Parents
  • Why must any bonding be done after the main stopcock?

    I think that was only really intended for gas - as the gas people have a habit of deliberately introducing an insulating joint (IJ) specifically to stop diverted N currents flowing through their pipework - and where present these are usually incorporated into the valve/meter assembly. So bonding on the supply side would completely defeat the insulating joint, while bonding on the consumer's side is almost identical if there isn't an IJ, and likely harmless (if pointless) if there is.


       - Andy.
Reply
  • Why must any bonding be done after the main stopcock?

    I think that was only really intended for gas - as the gas people have a habit of deliberately introducing an insulating joint (IJ) specifically to stop diverted N currents flowing through their pipework - and where present these are usually incorporated into the valve/meter assembly. So bonding on the supply side would completely defeat the insulating joint, while bonding on the consumer's side is almost identical if there isn't an IJ, and likely harmless (if pointless) if there is.


       - Andy.
Children
No Data