Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 59 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 6325 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

bonding a short section of water supply pipe

wallywombat
In a victorian terrace house, a lead water supply pipe enters the damp cellar, runs about a meter along the wall to the main brass stopcock, then converts to plastic pipe before exiting the cellar to the rest of the house (which is likely to be a mixture of copper and plastic). The stopcock is a couple of feet away from the CU. Should the supply pipe be bonded? My feeling is no, but I'd be interested in other opinions.


While I'm on the subject, a more general question. Why must any bonding be done after the main stopcock? For example where the supply tees off immediately after the stopcock, is it better to bond one of the tees, or bond just before the stopcock? Where there is a long run of supply pipe before the stopcock, is it better to bond after, with a long MPBC run back to the MET, or bond it near the MET even where that's before the stopcock?
Parents
  • 0
    Whilst those numbers are correct for Brinell hardness they do not really relate to the case. They are obtained by pressing a 4 sided diamond into a thick block of the material with a known load and measuring the depression. The reason I said that annealed copper was softer is that the thin sections used in pipes behave by deflection not much dependant on the hardness, but the material modulus. A BS951 clamp cannot apply enough force to deform a lead gas pipe (about 4-5mm wall) very much, whereas a 0.8mm thick copper one (particularly if soft annealed like microbore pipes or well heated and cooled larger ones). The clamp itself is designed to spread the clamping force around much of the pipe diameter, and generally prevents very much deformation of the circular shape which is inherently very strong (think of bridge arches). I think your fears are groundless, but you may care to try it one day when you find an odd bit of lead (although often a harder alloy called compo in times past) pipe. The wide ranges of the number for Brinell hardness are caused by the wide range of tempers of the material, depending on mechanical and heat treatments before you get it. Take aluminium alloys, for example, T6016 which is used for many purposes including aircraft. Its strength (or stiffness) can be varied across a wide range by heat treatment, the strongest and stiffest being T6016-T6. The same annealed correctly is very soft and easily bent, the -T6 is very stiff indeed. Neither copper or lead pipe will be punctured by mechanical deformation unless very severe, the copper being the most susceptible because it work hardens and becomes brittle.
Reply
  • 0
    Whilst those numbers are correct for Brinell hardness they do not really relate to the case. They are obtained by pressing a 4 sided diamond into a thick block of the material with a known load and measuring the depression. The reason I said that annealed copper was softer is that the thin sections used in pipes behave by deflection not much dependant on the hardness, but the material modulus. A BS951 clamp cannot apply enough force to deform a lead gas pipe (about 4-5mm wall) very much, whereas a 0.8mm thick copper one (particularly if soft annealed like microbore pipes or well heated and cooled larger ones). The clamp itself is designed to spread the clamping force around much of the pipe diameter, and generally prevents very much deformation of the circular shape which is inherently very strong (think of bridge arches). I think your fears are groundless, but you may care to try it one day when you find an odd bit of lead (although often a harder alloy called compo in times past) pipe. The wide ranges of the number for Brinell hardness are caused by the wide range of tempers of the material, depending on mechanical and heat treatments before you get it. Take aluminium alloys, for example, T6016 which is used for many purposes including aircraft. Its strength (or stiffness) can be varied across a wide range by heat treatment, the strongest and stiffest being T6016-T6. The same annealed correctly is very soft and easily bent, the -T6 is very stiff indeed. Neither copper or lead pipe will be punctured by mechanical deformation unless very severe, the copper being the most susceptible because it work hardens and becomes brittle.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines