This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

bonding a short section of water supply pipe

In a victorian terrace house, a lead water supply pipe enters the damp cellar, runs about a meter along the wall to the main brass stopcock, then converts to plastic pipe before exiting the cellar to the rest of the house (which is likely to be a mixture of copper and plastic). The stopcock is a couple of feet away from the CU. Should the supply pipe be bonded? My feeling is no, but I'd be interested in other opinions.


While I'm on the subject, a more general question. Why must any bonding be done after the main stopcock? For example where the supply tees off immediately after the stopcock, is it better to bond one of the tees, or bond just before the stopcock? Where there is a long run of supply pipe before the stopcock, is it better to bond after, with a long MPBC run back to the MET, or bond it near the MET even where that's before the stopcock?
Parents
  • So the post Second World War policy of combining the functions of neutral and earth in just one conductor, as opposed to TN-S to save materials and labour, has resulted in us now having to main bond conductive pipes and other extraneous conductive parts with millions of metres of heavy copper cable. Were the original designers of P.M.E. short sighted?


    Z.
Reply
  • So the post Second World War policy of combining the functions of neutral and earth in just one conductor, as opposed to TN-S to save materials and labour, has resulted in us now having to main bond conductive pipes and other extraneous conductive parts with millions of metres of heavy copper cable. Were the original designers of P.M.E. short sighted?


    Z.
Children
No Data