Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1675 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

VIRTUAL ELEX SHOW IET PRESENTATION

John Peckham
Good afternoon All


As the IET have not been able to do face to face Elex shows the organisers of the Elex shows have come up with the idea of a virtual Elex show. The IET are keen to contribute to the virtual show and are going to film a webinar using the same sort of format as the live shows.


Following the live show format the IET are going to present 2 topics. The chosen topics from the feedback from the live show audiences are PME earthing and bonding and EV charging.


So if you were in the live audience what questions would you like to ask? Post them on here and I will feed them back to the IET presenters to answer in the Q&A session?


The downside is no free bacon roll I am sorry to say!


JP

Parents
  • 0
    I’m not sure that’s a fair question to be asking the IET, AJ. They can’t be responsible for how legal documents are framed.

    But given the existance of regulation 114 (and possibly 115) I don't think it's unreasonable for the IET to be able to provide us with some proper guidance.

     
    A wide ranging test commissioned by Myenergi showed that out of 10000 open pen situations 10% resulted in dangerous voltages from car to ground that would not have been detected by voltage measurement only.

    To play devil's advocate, I might obsever that only a little worse than the 7% failure rate for RCDs (including those in TT systems that are totally relied upon for ADS).

     
    "Is that the whole story?"

    Is that a suggestion that the N voltage during a broken PEN event isn't likely to stable - rather than just being a single voltage for the duration it's more likely to be bouncing all over the place - so quite likely to be outside of that "10%" sooner or later, and as long as the device latches off and requires a manual reset, is likely to detect most events, if with a small extra delay.


       - Andy.
Reply
  • 0
    I’m not sure that’s a fair question to be asking the IET, AJ. They can’t be responsible for how legal documents are framed.

    But given the existance of regulation 114 (and possibly 115) I don't think it's unreasonable for the IET to be able to provide us with some proper guidance.

     
    A wide ranging test commissioned by Myenergi showed that out of 10000 open pen situations 10% resulted in dangerous voltages from car to ground that would not have been detected by voltage measurement only.

    To play devil's advocate, I might obsever that only a little worse than the 7% failure rate for RCDs (including those in TT systems that are totally relied upon for ADS).

     
    "Is that the whole story?"

    Is that a suggestion that the N voltage during a broken PEN event isn't likely to stable - rather than just being a single voltage for the duration it's more likely to be bouncing all over the place - so quite likely to be outside of that "10%" sooner or later, and as long as the device latches off and requires a manual reset, is likely to detect most events, if with a small extra delay.


       - Andy.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines