This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Radial Circuit using box installation method...

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am curious if anyone has ever done this, and if not any reason?  Is it acceptable? 


So, the scenario is that you install a radial circuit for lighting or sockets for that matter (could apply to either in this instance), and the image I've attached as the example probably isn't the best, but it was the clearest image I could find. 


The example is as follows - you have a circuit coming from the CU on a 16amp radial, rather than just go from one to the other repeatedly could you not use a junction box installation method. As long as the box was accessible.  I know the image shows lighting etc, but I was not thinking of it like that in this instance, it would be either just lighting or just sockets. 


992563266d16340370be4f2ff3f68dde-huge-screenshot-2021-02-15-at-16.28.37.png1f339cb9468d38ac0d0749602b0dec82-huge-screenshot-2021-02-15-at-16.42.16.png


Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    mapj1:

    Given that UK socket back boxes are much bigger than their continental counterparts, we do not need the joint box, and can tee off at any convenient double socket.

    As others have noted, junction  boxes are not something you normally design in from the outset on socket circuits, but rather are a sign of later additions or changes during building works, Perfectly acceptable though, so long as done properly.


    Unfused spurs from a 32A radial need to be in 4mm (*), and not all sockets will take 3 lots of 4mm cable comfortably - I'd want a deeper box than the minimum 25mm for that.


    (*) though I agree, given that a single twin socket is OK on 2,5mm2 from a 32A ring, then it will be perfectly OK on a 32A  radial too, and then in the  book of perfectly good but confusing circuits there is the lassoo - with a ring of 2.5mm on the end/side of a 4mm feeder.

    No such book exists, but I often think it should.


    You can have a single socket cabled in 2.5mm from a 4mm cabled socket has long as the 2.5mm cable is clip direct which gives it a 27A rating given that a single socket will only ever be loaded to 26A max limited by the 13A fuses in the plugs. So the deciding factor is the installation method and cable derating factors as far has I'm aware ?. 

    regards ts


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    mapj1:

    Given that UK socket back boxes are much bigger than their continental counterparts, we do not need the joint box, and can tee off at any convenient double socket.

    As others have noted, junction  boxes are not something you normally design in from the outset on socket circuits, but rather are a sign of later additions or changes during building works, Perfectly acceptable though, so long as done properly.


    Unfused spurs from a 32A radial need to be in 4mm (*), and not all sockets will take 3 lots of 4mm cable comfortably - I'd want a deeper box than the minimum 25mm for that.


    (*) though I agree, given that a single twin socket is OK on 2,5mm2 from a 32A ring, then it will be perfectly OK on a 32A  radial too, and then in the  book of perfectly good but confusing circuits there is the lassoo - with a ring of 2.5mm on the end/side of a 4mm feeder.

    No such book exists, but I often think it should.


    You can have a single socket cabled in 2.5mm from a 4mm cabled socket has long as the 2.5mm cable is clip direct which gives it a 27A rating given that a single socket will only ever be loaded to 26A max limited by the 13A fuses in the plugs. So the deciding factor is the installation method and cable derating factors as far has I'm aware ?. 

    regards ts


Children
No Data