This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Radial Circuit using box installation method...

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am curious if anyone has ever done this, and if not any reason?  Is it acceptable? 


So, the scenario is that you install a radial circuit for lighting or sockets for that matter (could apply to either in this instance), and the image I've attached as the example probably isn't the best, but it was the clearest image I could find. 


The example is as follows - you have a circuit coming from the CU on a 16amp radial, rather than just go from one to the other repeatedly could you not use a junction box installation method. As long as the box was accessible.  I know the image shows lighting etc, but I was not thinking of it like that in this instance, it would be either just lighting or just sockets. 


992563266d16340370be4f2ff3f68dde-huge-screenshot-2021-02-15-at-16.28.37.png1f339cb9468d38ac0d0749602b0dec82-huge-screenshot-2021-02-15-at-16.42.16.png


Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    AJJewsbury:

    That diagram looks distinctly German - black for line and two-pin with scraping earth arrangement for the sockets,


    There is a lot of variety of styles between countries - often one convention re-inforcing another over time - with little more than historical accident at the start of the divergence. European style sockets for example traditionally had a screw terminals where the wire was wrapped around under the screw head against a flat plate (a bit like on BS 951 clamps) rather than there being a "tunnel" - hence it was difficult to reliably terminate more than a single conductor in a socket terninal so junction boxes became the automatic way of doing things - even when using singles in conduit which looks bizzare to UK eyes. Once everyone was using joint boxes there was little need to "improve" the sockets to take multiple conductors, so the situation stuck. The UK on the other hand seemed to like tunnel terminals from an early date - which made shoving multiple wires into the same terminal easy and reliable - so as soon as the cost of the extra cable needed for 'looping in' dropped below the cost of a JB and the extra labour in installing it, looping-in caught on and joint boxes were mostly relegated to alterations and additions. The American had a similar problem to the Europeans, but they had more space in their back boxes - so ended up joining multiple conductors using "wire nuts" (screwits in old English) in the back of the box and just taking a single fly lead to the accessory - so a bit of a half-way house.


       - Andy.


    That rings true, and is very interesting.  The image is indeed from a German section as the French and Italian ones were even more strange and that was the closest I could obtain an image to reflect what I was trying to ask. 


    Those boxes still come with screw terminals in some but are very very rare, they are push connectors now.  I have seen the US system you refer to and indeed you are correct they seem to terminate in the box with all the cables behind and then take another cable into the socket/switch.


     


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    AJJewsbury:

    That diagram looks distinctly German - black for line and two-pin with scraping earth arrangement for the sockets,


    There is a lot of variety of styles between countries - often one convention re-inforcing another over time - with little more than historical accident at the start of the divergence. European style sockets for example traditionally had a screw terminals where the wire was wrapped around under the screw head against a flat plate (a bit like on BS 951 clamps) rather than there being a "tunnel" - hence it was difficult to reliably terminate more than a single conductor in a socket terninal so junction boxes became the automatic way of doing things - even when using singles in conduit which looks bizzare to UK eyes. Once everyone was using joint boxes there was little need to "improve" the sockets to take multiple conductors, so the situation stuck. The UK on the other hand seemed to like tunnel terminals from an early date - which made shoving multiple wires into the same terminal easy and reliable - so as soon as the cost of the extra cable needed for 'looping in' dropped below the cost of a JB and the extra labour in installing it, looping-in caught on and joint boxes were mostly relegated to alterations and additions. The American had a similar problem to the Europeans, but they had more space in their back boxes - so ended up joining multiple conductors using "wire nuts" (screwits in old English) in the back of the box and just taking a single fly lead to the accessory - so a bit of a half-way house.


       - Andy.


    That rings true, and is very interesting.  The image is indeed from a German section as the French and Italian ones were even more strange and that was the closest I could obtain an image to reflect what I was trying to ask. 


    Those boxes still come with screw terminals in some but are very very rare, they are push connectors now.  I have seen the US system you refer to and indeed you are correct they seem to terminate in the box with all the cables behind and then take another cable into the socket/switch.


     


Children
No Data