Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 22 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 2749 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

testing safe of a 16 Amp commando socket/plug

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hello,i am an RF engineer and we have equipment that is fed by rack mounted AC/DC converters which charge batteries. these converters are wired into fused spurs using 2.5mm arctic blue cable routed into cable trunking. the 2.5mm cable is fixed in the rack before entering the trunking.

At the moment we are all trained in testing the circuit is switched off using a martindale VIPD138 voltage indicator and proving unit and then we lock off the circuit.

Everyone's training is due to expire and our company health and safety department want to change the installation from the fused spur to 16 Amp commando sockets/plugs rather than retrain everyone in proving the circuit has been switched off.


I have no issues with using commando sockets instead of the fused spurs but my concern is that if the nearest location the commando socket can be mounted is the other end of the room and there are numerous commando sockets supplying different racks how do you prove you have pulled the correct plug? surely you have to still be able to test the circuit has been switched off using the tester and training required.


I am having a discussion with the Health and safety department next week so any advice would be gratefully received.

Thanks
Parents
  • 0
    Sparkingchip:

    To use a Martindale VIPD138 voltage indicator and proving unit to carry out safe isolation you have to open the terminal enclosure and test at the live terminals, which unless the equipment is being repaired and the enclosure needs to be opened for work to be carried out is not appropriate, is it?


    There is always a risk that in the course of proving dead, the supply is in fact found to be live. If that were not the case, proving dead would be pointless, would it not?


Reply
  • 0
    Sparkingchip:

    To use a Martindale VIPD138 voltage indicator and proving unit to carry out safe isolation you have to open the terminal enclosure and test at the live terminals, which unless the equipment is being repaired and the enclosure needs to be opened for work to be carried out is not appropriate, is it?


    There is always a risk that in the course of proving dead, the supply is in fact found to be live. If that were not the case, proving dead would be pointless, would it not?


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines