Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1780 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Earthing and Bonding

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi All


Working on a scheme whereby we have a private transformer serving the site - TN-S arrangement. This comes into the building, we then split to feed a switchboard in one part of the building which is existing, the second split heads to a new build part which has the second switchboard. This new build contains swimming pool. The supply to the new switchboard is via a busbar 3L+N+PER. Question relating to earth bars - we currently have the main earthing bar at the intake point which is at the existing switchboard location - we then had cable feeding out to the new earth bar at the new switchboard location. Contractor is proposing that they remove this interlinking earth cable between bars, and take a bond directly from the new switchboard earth bar to the new earth bar in the room. Does this sound feasible - to me doesnt sound right, but I can't find anything specific to say not.


Many thanks
Parents
  • 0
    If it helps at all, where an installation spans several buildings, it's usual to have a "main earth terminal" for each building (often called a building earth marshalling terminal in subsidurary buildings to distinguish it from the installation's MET) - the idea being that all c.p.c.s and bonding conductors are brought together within each building - so minimising the potential difference between parts within each building.  So there's little need to have separate bonding and earthing conductors between buildings - as they'd be connected together at both ends anyway - the only exception I can think of is where the main cable's c.p.c. (e.g. steel wire armour) isn't sufficient for a bonding conductor and so another G/Y is run alongside - in parallel.


       - Andy.
Reply
  • 0
    If it helps at all, where an installation spans several buildings, it's usual to have a "main earth terminal" for each building (often called a building earth marshalling terminal in subsidurary buildings to distinguish it from the installation's MET) - the idea being that all c.p.c.s and bonding conductors are brought together within each building - so minimising the potential difference between parts within each building.  So there's little need to have separate bonding and earthing conductors between buildings - as they'd be connected together at both ends anyway - the only exception I can think of is where the main cable's c.p.c. (e.g. steel wire armour) isn't sufficient for a bonding conductor and so another G/Y is run alongside - in parallel.


       - Andy.
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines