This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Insulated ceiling ring final nightmare.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am having a bit of a nightmare trying to adequately size cable for a ring final. The existing circuit is 2.5mm2 T&E which runs in the ceiling void between ground floor and first floor (this is a residential property). Currently there is no ceiling insulation installed. An extension means a new ceiling and significant modification to the ring final, and also (to meet regs) sound proofing insulation installed in the ceiling. This has a similar U value to thermal insulation in most cases.


100mm of insulation is to be installed throughout the new ceiling - which is 50% old circuit.


My first thought were to re-wire the whole circuit in 4mm T&E as with 2.5mm2 and the 18th ed tables its method of installation in all places wont give me 20A on each leg of the ring.


Great I thought, problem solved with plenty of overhead. More of a pain at 2nd fix, but not the end of the world.


Except now when I am looking through it seems like 4mm2 might not be enough if its going to run the risk of being covered with insulation. Joists are 170mm, so while the cable will not be covered completely the insulation will tend to balloon around it, so it looks like I will have to de-rate by a factor of 0.5 which would mean needing 6mm2 cable which seems crazy.


Any thoughts? Where am I going wrong in my assumptions / calcs?


Thanks in advance


James
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Alcomax:

    Before anything else, what does the ring final serve? i.e. the real likely demand. Also, are you going to be running any other new circuits through this soon be be insulated ceiling?

    Traditionally, first fix of cables has always been though centre of floor joists. Fine when no insulation, but later on any lateral runs are potentially to be covered by insulation. Similar in a way to lofts. Yes it is a problem. 16 amp or 20 amp ring reduction can help. With 4mm ring if I remember without calculating, a bit of a get out is a 25 amp OCD, though not all switchgear manufacturers do a 25 in some domestic CUs, though Hager has a full range that fits commercial and domestic. Not sure about other makes.




    Thanks for the reply:


    The ring final currently supplied a living room and two bedrooms. I didnt want to overcomplicate the already slightly complicated first post but can see more clarity would be useful.


    The groundfloor is being reconfigured and the living room becomes a kitchen, the extension the new living room. First floor is also reconfigured from 2 bedrooms to 3 bedrooms and an ensuite.


    Loads are likely to be relatively high so ring reduction below 32 Amps probably isnt going to be sufficient, certainly not for the kitchen component.

    Total floor area served will be 90 square metres though I am mindful that two ring finals would probably be a better solution given the appliances that are  likely to all be in use at the same time (washing machine, dishwasher, heat pump tumble drier, coffee machine, toaster, hairdryer etc). Although the figures suggest I can just sneak in under the 32 Amps I would much prefer a belt and braces approach.


    In the new area (extension) section I can run above the insulation clipped to joists as the joists are 225mm but to get to there I have to route along 170mm joists.


    As you say the first fix is indeed through the 'centre' of floor joists.


    Would a solution be to install substantial noggins between joists adjacent to the hole in joists and therefore be able to have the cable clipped and in contact with the noggins or joist throughout its path, provided I run 4mm2?


    If I understand this correctly I would then apply reference method A, which for 4mm2 in T&E gives me 25 Amps per leg.

    If I do this on alternate sides of the noggin this would give me 2 x 32 Amp ring finals 


    Any flaws to my logic here?


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Alcomax:

    Before anything else, what does the ring final serve? i.e. the real likely demand. Also, are you going to be running any other new circuits through this soon be be insulated ceiling?

    Traditionally, first fix of cables has always been though centre of floor joists. Fine when no insulation, but later on any lateral runs are potentially to be covered by insulation. Similar in a way to lofts. Yes it is a problem. 16 amp or 20 amp ring reduction can help. With 4mm ring if I remember without calculating, a bit of a get out is a 25 amp OCD, though not all switchgear manufacturers do a 25 in some domestic CUs, though Hager has a full range that fits commercial and domestic. Not sure about other makes.




    Thanks for the reply:


    The ring final currently supplied a living room and two bedrooms. I didnt want to overcomplicate the already slightly complicated first post but can see more clarity would be useful.


    The groundfloor is being reconfigured and the living room becomes a kitchen, the extension the new living room. First floor is also reconfigured from 2 bedrooms to 3 bedrooms and an ensuite.


    Loads are likely to be relatively high so ring reduction below 32 Amps probably isnt going to be sufficient, certainly not for the kitchen component.

    Total floor area served will be 90 square metres though I am mindful that two ring finals would probably be a better solution given the appliances that are  likely to all be in use at the same time (washing machine, dishwasher, heat pump tumble drier, coffee machine, toaster, hairdryer etc). Although the figures suggest I can just sneak in under the 32 Amps I would much prefer a belt and braces approach.


    In the new area (extension) section I can run above the insulation clipped to joists as the joists are 225mm but to get to there I have to route along 170mm joists.


    As you say the first fix is indeed through the 'centre' of floor joists.


    Would a solution be to install substantial noggins between joists adjacent to the hole in joists and therefore be able to have the cable clipped and in contact with the noggins or joist throughout its path, provided I run 4mm2?


    If I understand this correctly I would then apply reference method A, which for 4mm2 in T&E gives me 25 Amps per leg.

    If I do this on alternate sides of the noggin this would give me 2 x 32 Amp ring finals 


    Any flaws to my logic here?


Children
No Data