This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Insulated ceiling ring final nightmare.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am having a bit of a nightmare trying to adequately size cable for a ring final. The existing circuit is 2.5mm2 T&E which runs in the ceiling void between ground floor and first floor (this is a residential property). Currently there is no ceiling insulation installed. An extension means a new ceiling and significant modification to the ring final, and also (to meet regs) sound proofing insulation installed in the ceiling. This has a similar U value to thermal insulation in most cases.


100mm of insulation is to be installed throughout the new ceiling - which is 50% old circuit.


My first thought were to re-wire the whole circuit in 4mm T&E as with 2.5mm2 and the 18th ed tables its method of installation in all places wont give me 20A on each leg of the ring.


Great I thought, problem solved with plenty of overhead. More of a pain at 2nd fix, but not the end of the world.


Except now when I am looking through it seems like 4mm2 might not be enough if its going to run the risk of being covered with insulation. Joists are 170mm, so while the cable will not be covered completely the insulation will tend to balloon around it, so it looks like I will have to de-rate by a factor of 0.5 which would mean needing 6mm2 cable which seems crazy.


Any thoughts? Where am I going wrong in my assumptions / calcs?


Thanks in advance


James
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Chris Pearson:

    I can understand the satisfaction obtained from doing the work oneself and as a surgeon, jimmyhorns presumably likes fixing things with his hands.


    That's the easy bit!


    It occurs to me that the existing narrower ceiling does not need acoustic insulation because it must be no worse than it was previously. (R.4(3) of BR 2010). If the building control wallahs want it in the new bit, best to put it in, but the taller void will make it easier.

     


    My thoughts were exactly this - the old ceiling does not need 'improvement' as it will not be any worse than it was previously and is not dangerous. I conceed to David's superior knowledge of the soundproofing issues. Due to ceiling height considerations dropping it further in the new kitchen section would not be practical - what you say does make perfect sense in terms of the difference in mechanism of actions of the differing types of insulation.


    Building control's approach on this is that it is a new single room, rather than an old room and a new room. The existing rear wall of the property, (apart from 2 x 700mm piers that come out from the wall to support the 6 metre steel) disappear. On the basis that this is a new room, and this area of the room has a change of use into a kitchen, now requires different ventilation / extraction and fire detection I can live with the notion that this is 'new' rather than existing. I also note that part E only applies to new builds. 


    I have already had conversations regarding the above and BC have been very reasonable about some other aspects of the build that could have ended up being very expensive to solve but common sense prevailed. I am not up for the fight on this if there is now a solution, even if this means a bit of extra work for me... life is just too short :)



    Well the first bit of the electrical notes:


    Supply and Main intake:


    Single phase, 230V 25mm2 supply into 100 Amp cut out (Henley series 7) with TN-C-S Earth system


    25mm2 meter tails from cut out to 80 Amp (non-smart) Meter


    25mm2 consumer tails and 16mm2 Earth to Switch Fused unit (100Amp) and then into 100Amp Dual RCD consumer unit.


    Planned circuits with diversity calcs:


    Lighting 1 - 20 x 10W luminaires (All LED) = 200W = 200/230 = 0.87 Amps, applying 66% diversity =    0.56 Amps

    Lighting 2 - 30 x 10W luminaires = 300W = 300/230 = 1.3 Amps, applying 66% diversity =                     0.86 Amps


    Immersion Heater - 3000W = 3000/230 = 13 Amps. No diversity =                                                           13 Amps

    Cooker - 4800W = 4800/230 = 21 Amps, applying diversity 10 = (0.3x11) = 10 + 3.3 =                            13.3 Amps


    Ring final 1 = 32 Amps full load. No diversity applied                                                                                 32 Amps

    Ring final 2 = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                        12.8 Amps

    Ring final 3 = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                        12.8 Amps

    Garage radial = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                    12.8 Amps


    Total maximum demand applying diversity =.                                                                                             98.12 Amps





    So the first issue I get to is that it is unclear whether the supply is rated for 100 Amps (though the cabling is, the meter isnt and the DNO may not specify a 100A supply)


    Any flaws so far?


     


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Chris Pearson:

    I can understand the satisfaction obtained from doing the work oneself and as a surgeon, jimmyhorns presumably likes fixing things with his hands.


    That's the easy bit!


    It occurs to me that the existing narrower ceiling does not need acoustic insulation because it must be no worse than it was previously. (R.4(3) of BR 2010). If the building control wallahs want it in the new bit, best to put it in, but the taller void will make it easier.

     


    My thoughts were exactly this - the old ceiling does not need 'improvement' as it will not be any worse than it was previously and is not dangerous. I conceed to David's superior knowledge of the soundproofing issues. Due to ceiling height considerations dropping it further in the new kitchen section would not be practical - what you say does make perfect sense in terms of the difference in mechanism of actions of the differing types of insulation.


    Building control's approach on this is that it is a new single room, rather than an old room and a new room. The existing rear wall of the property, (apart from 2 x 700mm piers that come out from the wall to support the 6 metre steel) disappear. On the basis that this is a new room, and this area of the room has a change of use into a kitchen, now requires different ventilation / extraction and fire detection I can live with the notion that this is 'new' rather than existing. I also note that part E only applies to new builds. 


    I have already had conversations regarding the above and BC have been very reasonable about some other aspects of the build that could have ended up being very expensive to solve but common sense prevailed. I am not up for the fight on this if there is now a solution, even if this means a bit of extra work for me... life is just too short :)



    Well the first bit of the electrical notes:


    Supply and Main intake:


    Single phase, 230V 25mm2 supply into 100 Amp cut out (Henley series 7) with TN-C-S Earth system


    25mm2 meter tails from cut out to 80 Amp (non-smart) Meter


    25mm2 consumer tails and 16mm2 Earth to Switch Fused unit (100Amp) and then into 100Amp Dual RCD consumer unit.


    Planned circuits with diversity calcs:


    Lighting 1 - 20 x 10W luminaires (All LED) = 200W = 200/230 = 0.87 Amps, applying 66% diversity =    0.56 Amps

    Lighting 2 - 30 x 10W luminaires = 300W = 300/230 = 1.3 Amps, applying 66% diversity =                     0.86 Amps


    Immersion Heater - 3000W = 3000/230 = 13 Amps. No diversity =                                                           13 Amps

    Cooker - 4800W = 4800/230 = 21 Amps, applying diversity 10 = (0.3x11) = 10 + 3.3 =                            13.3 Amps


    Ring final 1 = 32 Amps full load. No diversity applied                                                                                 32 Amps

    Ring final 2 = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                        12.8 Amps

    Ring final 3 = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                        12.8 Amps

    Garage radial = 32 Amps full load, applying 40% diversity = 32 x 0.4 =                                                    12.8 Amps


    Total maximum demand applying diversity =.                                                                                             98.12 Amps





    So the first issue I get to is that it is unclear whether the supply is rated for 100 Amps (though the cabling is, the meter isnt and the DNO may not specify a 100A supply)


    Any flaws so far?


     


Children
No Data