Your answers Gentlemen, please. This is indicating a serious problem in the Industry. Trust is now zero. I am disgusted with the behavior of these alleged "inspectors" who are dim, dumb, deaf and blind, and cannot read the BBB. It is not good enough is it?
"I remember attending and passing my 2391 back in 1998 and it was a tough but fair assessment and I actually learnt valuable detail on that course, we all know it had a high failure rate and it was laterly weakened down"
Agreed that`s the one I did in that year too but yes the Tutor told us the number of defects he had to have on the board to satisfy City & Guilds which OK is fair enough but like you I agree he should not have told us this number and no way encourage us to add non defects as defects without penalty . If there were indeed say 12 defects and say you spotted them all but also listed another 8 non defects I would award 12 - 8 = 4 total marks whereas he would award 12 marks. I thought that was a mockery
"I remember attending and passing my 2391 back in 1998 and it was a tough but fair assessment and I actually learnt valuable detail on that course, we all know it had a high failure rate and it was laterly weakened down"
Agreed that`s the one I did in that year too but yes the Tutor told us the number of defects he had to have on the board to satisfy City & Guilds which OK is fair enough but like you I agree he should not have told us this number and no way encourage us to add non defects as defects without penalty . If there were indeed say 12 defects and say you spotted them all but also listed another 8 non defects I would award 12 - 8 = 4 total marks whereas he would award 12 marks. I thought that was a mockery
