AJJewsbury:Two simultaneously-accessible "earth" potentials. "just not exposed to touch when the box is shut."
Inside an enclosure is perfectly OK for bare hazardous live conductors - are you really suggesting we need to go further for differing Earthed conductors?
- Andy.
Yes it is, from an "ordinary persons" perspective.
However, I believe you pointed out that the armour was required to be accessible for testing purposes. So, what's your CDM risk assessment for a safe environment for maintenance (including inspection and testing) and decommissioning? BS 7671 says IP2X/IPXX/D ... are you suggesting a lesser requirement is acceptable?
Since it's reasonably practicable to take this into account, why put those carrying out inspection and testing at unnecessary risk?
AJJewsbury:Two simultaneously-accessible "earth" potentials. "just not exposed to touch when the box is shut."
Inside an enclosure is perfectly OK for bare hazardous live conductors - are you really suggesting we need to go further for differing Earthed conductors?
- Andy.
Yes it is, from an "ordinary persons" perspective.
However, I believe you pointed out that the armour was required to be accessible for testing purposes. So, what's your CDM risk assessment for a safe environment for maintenance (including inspection and testing) and decommissioning? BS 7671 says IP2X/IPXX/D ... are you suggesting a lesser requirement is acceptable?
Since it's reasonably practicable to take this into account, why put those carrying out inspection and testing at unnecessary risk?
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site