This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Wet Location Body Resistance

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
What body resistance is assumed in wet locations vs dry locations? I have a feeling Table 41.1 does not take wet locations into account.
Parents
  • I think that you meant that the resistance goes up when charring starts. ..

    Not really, once the skin has burnt away, the tissue below the surface that is exposed and  is wetter and a better conductor.

    Unfortunately, the lethal current is likely to have stopped the heart ...


    Not at all - it is quite common to survive a shock with significant entry and exit wounds, especially if the contact area is small, less than a square inch or so, and so long as the burns are properly treated to prevent infection, the long term prospects are good. Quite a lot of shocks are not across the  torso,  and in that case there may not be any fibrillation at all.

    Equally, there have been many tragic cases where a lethal current flows, but the contact area was large and there is no obvious damage to the skin.

    Electric shock is not anything like the  exact science some standards writers would like it to be....

    Mike.
Reply
  • I think that you meant that the resistance goes up when charring starts. ..

    Not really, once the skin has burnt away, the tissue below the surface that is exposed and  is wetter and a better conductor.

    Unfortunately, the lethal current is likely to have stopped the heart ...


    Not at all - it is quite common to survive a shock with significant entry and exit wounds, especially if the contact area is small, less than a square inch or so, and so long as the burns are properly treated to prevent infection, the long term prospects are good. Quite a lot of shocks are not across the  torso,  and in that case there may not be any fibrillation at all.

    Equally, there have been many tragic cases where a lethal current flows, but the contact area was large and there is no obvious damage to the skin.

    Electric shock is not anything like the  exact science some standards writers would like it to be....

    Mike.
Children
No Data