This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Wet Location Body Resistance

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
What body resistance is assumed in wet locations vs dry locations? I have a feeling Table 41.1 does not take wet locations into account.
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    AJJewsbury:
    Table 41.1 seems to be based on a 0.8 multipler?

    How do you mean?

    Any idea how this translates into a disconnection time?

    BS 7671, for various wet locations, seems generally to keep 41.1 disconnection times for ADS but add other measures (such as 30mA RCDs or supplementary bonding) - rather than stipulating a shorter ADS disconnection time per se.


      - Andy.





    I saw that, and to be honest I don't agree with it from an ethics or code intent perspective. RCD failures are rather common in comparison, and outdoors supplementary bonding is not required.


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    AJJewsbury:
    Table 41.1 seems to be based on a 0.8 multipler?

    How do you mean?

    Any idea how this translates into a disconnection time?

    BS 7671, for various wet locations, seems generally to keep 41.1 disconnection times for ADS but add other measures (such as 30mA RCDs or supplementary bonding) - rather than stipulating a shorter ADS disconnection time per se.


      - Andy.





    I saw that, and to be honest I don't agree with it from an ethics or code intent perspective. RCD failures are rather common in comparison, and outdoors supplementary bonding is not required.


Children
No Data