This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EICR – CONSUMER UNIT IP PROTECTION

EICR – CONSUMER UNIT IP PROTECTION
The C.U. in question is an old Wylex fuseboard that has, replacement, plug-in MCBs installed, complete with new carriers.
There is no covering lid. This was, presumably disposed of when the fuses were replaced.
The C.U is mounted near the corner of a wall such that the board can be seen end-on. The side view of the replacement MCB and carrier reveals a very narrow gap between carrier and base of the MCB such that the (live) MCB brass plug-in connections can be seen. The gap is about 15mm long and less than 1mm wide. Probably better than IP4X.
This is better than the specified IP2X minimum but could be deemed a danger because it would be unexpected rather than other applications with open electrical connections – like a lamp holder.
Forum Members comments would be appreciated


Regards
Parents
  • Well the EICR is one thing - recommend improvement,  this is not actually illegal, is correct.

    Maybe add a cover not saying that improvement is very strongly recommended in the next year or so, as you consider that  there is a significant residual safety risk with this older equipment, in this case, if you think there is.


    Personally I'd not worry that much - you could pull the wrong end of of an IEC lead out from the back of some equipment and be exposed to a similar non-risk.

    Mike.
Reply
  • Well the EICR is one thing - recommend improvement,  this is not actually illegal, is correct.

    Maybe add a cover not saying that improvement is very strongly recommended in the next year or so, as you consider that  there is a significant residual safety risk with this older equipment, in this case, if you think there is.


    Personally I'd not worry that much - you could pull the wrong end of of an IEC lead out from the back of some equipment and be exposed to a similar non-risk.

    Mike.
Children
No Data