Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 1969 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Wagos in a 2G socket backbox....

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I'm running through the options with regards to terminating a 4mm2 ring when it comes to the sockets. For some of the 2G sockets there is plenty of space to easily / reliably terminate the 4mm2 cable, in others not so much.


What would be a whole lot easier (there is plenty of space as I fitted 35mm back boxes) would be to loop in and out via a couple of wago 221 3-way connectors using the 3rd way as a spur to the socket, allowing just a single cable needing to be clamped down at the socket terminal itself.


I'm sure I won't have been the first to have thought of this.


Thoughts please? The only limitation I can see is that I would'nt be able to spur off the socket (but could of course just use a wago with more ways).


It has been a long week and I just wanted to sense check this........


Thanks in advance


James
Parents
  • 0
    Installation method may preclude 2.5 (e.g. methods 101# or 103) as the current carrying capacity has to be at least 20 A.


    Volt drop is another potential reason - assuming 30 mA RCD protection is provided at the DB or CU as ring is feeding socket-outlets - ring length end-to-end exceeds 106 m {see Table 7.1(i) of OSG}


    Or perhaps it was simply in a specification for some reason ...
Reply
  • 0
    Installation method may preclude 2.5 (e.g. methods 101# or 103) as the current carrying capacity has to be at least 20 A.


    Volt drop is another potential reason - assuming 30 mA RCD protection is provided at the DB or CU as ring is feeding socket-outlets - ring length end-to-end exceeds 106 m {see Table 7.1(i) of OSG}


    Or perhaps it was simply in a specification for some reason ...
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines