It should apply to anyone who terminates and connects a conductor.
John Peckham:
...
What is needed is an individual competence scheme where the qualifications and assessments are carried out by a different body to the registration scheme. Proper QCF qualifications and an on site assessment. Any organistation can run the registration scheme but this would be tendered out by government with the biggest tender criteria of cost to the individual just like the gas scheme. It should apply to anyone who terminates and connects a conductor. With a photo card on the back of which a list of work you are authorised to perform e.g LV installation work, fire alarms, emergency lighting, safety services and inspection and testing. The registration scheme should also have grades of assessment for designers and Inspectors who may be registered engineers in addition to electricians.
...
(not trying to be obtuse)
Why [for each 'need' suggested]; for what aim, objective, purpose etc.
And if one agreed with a new proposal, there are other [related] issues to consider; not least the validity of the local authority notifications process, or DIY 'works'.
Sparkingchip:
Am I going to get shot down in flames if I comment that the closure of the Stroma Electrical Competence scheme coincides with the raising of the bar for the entrance requirements to join these competence schemes?
I was thinking about that there’s a decreasing number of customers, as Certsure refers to electricians.
wallywombat:
So, has Part P and the Schemes had any discernible effect on electrical safety?
Has it deterred DIYers from attempting bigger jobs outside their competence?
Has it made allied trades like kitchen fitters and shower installers better trained and more likely to do the right thing?
Has it upped the professionalism of the trade by forcing electricians to undergo regular testing and inspection and receiving feedback?
This is isn't meant to be sarcastic. I'm genuinely interested in what people think.
No, possible the opposite,
No,
No, those who aren't competent probably will not have changed,
No, the good ones will have done it anyway those who are not bothered are unlikely to benefit from training, feedback etc.
Having been so negative above I believe the good electricians are in the majority but are let down by a system that allows enterprise registration to use unregistered electricians while pretending they are effectively registered irrespective of their competence.
Commenting on another post above I changed from ELECSA to STROMA and was happy with both of them but STROMA was much cheaper for a similar service.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site