This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

reduced cable

Hi guys just wanted to ask what you think of this. 


there is a bit of temporary kit which runs a 22KW motor. the FLC is 41 amps the cable supplying the motor is 10mm flex this then goes into a JB which someone has connected 6mm YY cable (4 core Lapp 130H) to extend the cable to a local isolater. the local isolator where the supply has been picked up from is a 100amp supply fed from a MCC approx 50 meters away. the method of starting is by soft start. 


I spoke to another Electrician who told me its fine as it is as the overload has been switched down. my thoughts were the overload protects the motor not the cable. I know the maximum capacity of the cable is 44amps so i can understand the overload should trip but is there an issue just relying on the overload. my suggestion was to down rate the fuses after the soft start to 40amps  i know its close but for a temporary measure, the motor runs at 32 amps normally.
Parents
  • I take it fuses would only be needed if the disconnection times cannot be met?

    Yes, you still need to disconnect both to protect the cables in the case of a fault and for shock protection. The adiabatic is your friend for that (or comparing energy let-though with k²S² if the upstream protective device is a circuit breaker and you're looking at magnetic operation).

       - Andy.
Reply
  • I take it fuses would only be needed if the disconnection times cannot be met?

    Yes, you still need to disconnect both to protect the cables in the case of a fault and for shock protection. The adiabatic is your friend for that (or comparing energy let-though with k²S² if the upstream protective device is a circuit breaker and you're looking at magnetic operation).

       - Andy.
Children
No Data