This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main at Consumer unit

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
My daughter has just had an electrical safety check done and I suspect that the electrician has been over zeleous..

Would anyone care to comment.


There is no grommet where the meter tails enter the consumer unit and the outer insulation stops just short of the knockout.

He has graded this C1.   Now my opinion is that that does not present an  an immediate threat to the safety of personell

It needs fixing but surely only a C2?


More intriguing.  He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs.  I can't find that in the regs


And finally an old chestnut which has been discussed before.   A C3 because two radial "circuits" are served by a single breaker..  I have always argued that the definition of a circuit is that it is served by a single breaker.  Certainly if both radials were brought to a junction box outside the CU and then connected to the breaker by a single cable it would meet the definition of a radial..


Thanks for your attention

Parents
  • More intriguing. He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs. I can't find that in the regs

    I guess they're read 521.5.1 a little too literally. (..of an AC circuit ... all the line conductors ..)


    From the underlying physics point of view (even supposing there is a detrimental effect with thin-walled steel enclosures) there's no need to interpret it that way. But I must admit the wording of the reg could be better..


       - Andy.
Reply
  • More intriguing. He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs. I can't find that in the regs

    I guess they're read 521.5.1 a little too literally. (..of an AC circuit ... all the line conductors ..)


    From the underlying physics point of view (even supposing there is a detrimental effect with thin-walled steel enclosures) there's no need to interpret it that way. But I must admit the wording of the reg could be better..


       - Andy.
Children
No Data