Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 157 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 9741 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main at Consumer unit

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
My daughter has just had an electrical safety check done and I suspect that the electrician has been over zeleous..

Would anyone care to comment.


There is no grommet where the meter tails enter the consumer unit and the outer insulation stops just short of the knockout.

He has graded this C1.   Now my opinion is that that does not present an  an immediate threat to the safety of personell

It needs fixing but surely only a C2?


More intriguing.  He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs.  I can't find that in the regs


And finally an old chestnut which has been discussed before.   A C3 because two radial "circuits" are served by a single breaker..  I have always argued that the definition of a circuit is that it is served by a single breaker.  Certainly if both radials were brought to a junction box outside the CU and then connected to the breaker by a single cable it would meet the definition of a radial..


Thanks for your attention

Parents
  • 0
    dcbwhaley:

    And you shall be told. :-)

    The sheathing has been cut short by about 20mm and the coloured insulation is visible. No copper is visible and there is not room to get a dcb-standard finger into the knockout




    So it is a C2 for exposed single insulation and another C2 because there is not a grommet.


    The outcome is the same utter regardless of if it's a C1 or C2. I cannot see anything that is creating work that is not required, I cannot see that the inspector is trying to rip up off, you are just being pedantic.


Reply
  • 0
    dcbwhaley:

    And you shall be told. :-)

    The sheathing has been cut short by about 20mm and the coloured insulation is visible. No copper is visible and there is not room to get a dcb-standard finger into the knockout




    So it is a C2 for exposed single insulation and another C2 because there is not a grommet.


    The outcome is the same utter regardless of if it's a C1 or C2. I cannot see anything that is creating work that is not required, I cannot see that the inspector is trying to rip up off, you are just being pedantic.


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines