This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main at Consumer unit

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
My daughter has just had an electrical safety check done and I suspect that the electrician has been over zeleous..

Would anyone care to comment.


There is no grommet where the meter tails enter the consumer unit and the outer insulation stops just short of the knockout.

He has graded this C1.   Now my opinion is that that does not present an  an immediate threat to the safety of personell

It needs fixing but surely only a C2?


More intriguing.  He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs.  I can't find that in the regs


And finally an old chestnut which has been discussed before.   A C3 because two radial "circuits" are served by a single breaker..  I have always argued that the definition of a circuit is that it is served by a single breaker.  Certainly if both radials were brought to a junction box outside the CU and then connected to the breaker by a single cable it would meet the definition of a radial..


Thanks for your attention

Parents
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    I'm afraid your "friend" should NOT be an approved contractor. Reason: complete lack of basic knowledge. Just imagine his EICR, total disaster!


    Dave,

    I do not disagree with your point here, I know that is a perception shared by quite a few contractors (NIC or not). An urban myth amongst many. Hence why I pointed this one out to my friend, Possibly past assessors in NIC encourage such thoughts  I suspect.


    Ref RCBOs , yes Dave it`s the way I have usually persuaded as being an advantage because of the extra resilience during earth fault on one circuit not affecting another circuit resulting in loss of fridge/freezer or boiler for example and to ensure only loss of a lighting circuit caused by a fault on that particular circuit. Another reason , cooker circuits can sometimes be quite lossy ins res even when brand new . Electric shower leaks perhaps too. If not a complete RCBO set up then dual RCDs but RCBOs for boiler, cooker & shower as a min spec for me. Having said that I have been a complete front ender in my home installation  for quite a few years without many problems, however I do realise problems can result from soley 2 RCDs in a whole installation setup and I`d rather reduce that risk. For years many of my customers for house rewires have been 60, 70, 80 and even 90 years of age and I realise just losing a portion rather than a lot at once can make a difference not just for safety but also their piece of mind, more so than with the younger client.

     


Reply
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    I'm afraid your "friend" should NOT be an approved contractor. Reason: complete lack of basic knowledge. Just imagine his EICR, total disaster!


    Dave,

    I do not disagree with your point here, I know that is a perception shared by quite a few contractors (NIC or not). An urban myth amongst many. Hence why I pointed this one out to my friend, Possibly past assessors in NIC encourage such thoughts  I suspect.


    Ref RCBOs , yes Dave it`s the way I have usually persuaded as being an advantage because of the extra resilience during earth fault on one circuit not affecting another circuit resulting in loss of fridge/freezer or boiler for example and to ensure only loss of a lighting circuit caused by a fault on that particular circuit. Another reason , cooker circuits can sometimes be quite lossy ins res even when brand new . Electric shower leaks perhaps too. If not a complete RCBO set up then dual RCDs but RCBOs for boiler, cooker & shower as a min spec for me. Having said that I have been a complete front ender in my home installation  for quite a few years without many problems, however I do realise problems can result from soley 2 RCDs in a whole installation setup and I`d rather reduce that risk. For years many of my customers for house rewires have been 60, 70, 80 and even 90 years of age and I realise just losing a portion rather than a lot at once can make a difference not just for safety but also their piece of mind, more so than with the younger client.

     


Children
No Data