Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 157 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 9807 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main at Consumer unit

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
My daughter has just had an electrical safety check done and I suspect that the electrician has been over zeleous..

Would anyone care to comment.


There is no grommet where the meter tails enter the consumer unit and the outer insulation stops just short of the knockout.

He has graded this C1.   Now my opinion is that that does not present an  an immediate threat to the safety of personell

It needs fixing but surely only a C2?


More intriguing.  He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs.  I can't find that in the regs


And finally an old chestnut which has been discussed before.   A C3 because two radial "circuits" are served by a single breaker..  I have always argued that the definition of a circuit is that it is served by a single breaker.  Certainly if both radials were brought to a junction box outside the CU and then connected to the breaker by a single cable it would meet the definition of a radial..


Thanks for your attention

Parents
  • 0
    dcbwhaley:

    No.  I am merely asking for a second opinion on his conclusions.  If he is confident of therm that should cause him no pain.


    I have spoken to him and he is adamant that the missing grommet where the tails enter the CU is a C1 and that we should have the DNO disconnect the the power to the house until this can be sorted.  His reasoning is if the my daughter was standing on a ladder with his hand on the consumer unit when the insulation finally gave way there was both a risk of electrocution and of falling

    My advice to herr is not to touch the CU until the problem is resolved..  And there is a bed for her at dcb-towers if she wishes to follow the EICR advice

     


    This is not an immediate danger - it may be not how he would do it, nor indeed many on here, and should  be tidied up in due course, but is a long way from being as serious as suggested.


    C1 would be reserved for bare live copper within reach, or an equivalent.  Given we are talking about primary insulation intact, metal boxes earthed, what you have describe could be C3 or perhaps C2 depending quite what else is wrong there. Not exactly a matter of life and death.

    Perhaps he should take a few foreign holidays once it is permitted again, to re-calibrate his sense of electrical danger.  I can recommend Eastern bloc, or south American, installations as being very educational examples of things that are actually quite safe by demonstration, but it does not look like it to our standards.

    Mike.


     


Reply
  • 0
    dcbwhaley:

    No.  I am merely asking for a second opinion on his conclusions.  If he is confident of therm that should cause him no pain.


    I have spoken to him and he is adamant that the missing grommet where the tails enter the CU is a C1 and that we should have the DNO disconnect the the power to the house until this can be sorted.  His reasoning is if the my daughter was standing on a ladder with his hand on the consumer unit when the insulation finally gave way there was both a risk of electrocution and of falling

    My advice to herr is not to touch the CU until the problem is resolved..  And there is a bed for her at dcb-towers if she wishes to follow the EICR advice

     


    This is not an immediate danger - it may be not how he would do it, nor indeed many on here, and should  be tidied up in due course, but is a long way from being as serious as suggested.


    C1 would be reserved for bare live copper within reach, or an equivalent.  Given we are talking about primary insulation intact, metal boxes earthed, what you have describe could be C3 or perhaps C2 depending quite what else is wrong there. Not exactly a matter of life and death.

    Perhaps he should take a few foreign holidays once it is permitted again, to re-calibrate his sense of electrical danger.  I can recommend Eastern bloc, or south American, installations as being very educational examples of things that are actually quite safe by demonstration, but it does not look like it to our standards.

    Mike.


     


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines