This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main at Consumer unit

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
My daughter has just had an electrical safety check done and I suspect that the electrician has been over zeleous..

Would anyone care to comment.


There is no grommet where the meter tails enter the consumer unit and the outer insulation stops just short of the knockout.

He has graded this C1.   Now my opinion is that that does not present an  an immediate threat to the safety of personell

It needs fixing but surely only a C2?


More intriguing.  He gives a C3 to the ring circuit because the two legs enter the consumer unit through separate knock outs.  I can't find that in the regs


And finally an old chestnut which has been discussed before.   A C3 because two radial "circuits" are served by a single breaker..  I have always argued that the definition of a circuit is that it is served by a single breaker.  Certainly if both radials were brought to a junction box outside the CU and then connected to the breaker by a single cable it would meet the definition of a radial..


Thanks for your attention

Parents
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    You are doing it now Chris.

    Tails identified with the old colours are not a C3 by any reasonable test. There should be a label saying that mixed colours may be present, quite why that is needed is also dubious now, although when the change took place perhaps necessary. There is no need whatsoever to improve the wire colour codes. A black/red cable from a switch drop should have a red or brown sleeve on the switched live (black) but this may be given a C3, it is somewhat inconvenient when a ceiling rose is replaced. C2 is not somewhere between a C1 and C3 either, it is for potentially dangerous as you know very well, which the examples above are not, at least in the normal sense of danger. C3 is for regulation non-compliances which are not dangerous if you like that definition. A plastic CU in a domestic is not dangerous, it is potential loose screws which may be, so we code it as a C3. The inspector should check the screws and is then sure this problem is not present in the CU, thus C3. A plastic CU is perfectly permissible in other premises, so this requirement is somewhat anomalous, however, we seem to have it.


    Well, C3 if there is no colours notice. I must say that Daughter was somewhat alarmed when I slapped a "WARNING" notice on her CU. ?


    Notice or not, there is no need to replace the tails (or other cables) - just put those coloured (+/- lettered) cable ties around them. Not too difficult to rectify the grommet and sheath either.


    I fully agree that a plastic CU (at home) is only C3 (the power to this tablet arrives via one) but what of those loose screws? In testing them, do we not tighten them? Or having found them loose, do we return them to the condition in which we found them? Yes, that's a bit absurd!


Reply
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    You are doing it now Chris.

    Tails identified with the old colours are not a C3 by any reasonable test. There should be a label saying that mixed colours may be present, quite why that is needed is also dubious now, although when the change took place perhaps necessary. There is no need whatsoever to improve the wire colour codes. A black/red cable from a switch drop should have a red or brown sleeve on the switched live (black) but this may be given a C3, it is somewhat inconvenient when a ceiling rose is replaced. C2 is not somewhere between a C1 and C3 either, it is for potentially dangerous as you know very well, which the examples above are not, at least in the normal sense of danger. C3 is for regulation non-compliances which are not dangerous if you like that definition. A plastic CU in a domestic is not dangerous, it is potential loose screws which may be, so we code it as a C3. The inspector should check the screws and is then sure this problem is not present in the CU, thus C3. A plastic CU is perfectly permissible in other premises, so this requirement is somewhat anomalous, however, we seem to have it.


    Well, C3 if there is no colours notice. I must say that Daughter was somewhat alarmed when I slapped a "WARNING" notice on her CU. ?


    Notice or not, there is no need to replace the tails (or other cables) - just put those coloured (+/- lettered) cable ties around them. Not too difficult to rectify the grommet and sheath either.


    I fully agree that a plastic CU (at home) is only C3 (the power to this tablet arrives via one) but what of those loose screws? In testing them, do we not tighten them? Or having found them loose, do we return them to the condition in which we found them? Yes, that's a bit absurd!


Children
No Data