Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 789 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

adiabatic equation in both 434 and 543

wallywombat
Why does the adiabatic equation (and associated tables of k values) appear in both sections 434 and 543? Okay, so one is referring to line conductors and the other to protective conductors (and so will have different initial temperatures), but it's all much of a muchness, and surely could be combined. It also seems a bit strange that one is in part 4 while the other is in part 5. It all seems a bit arbitrary.


PS - fun fact: none of the following appear in the BS 7671 index: 'adiabatic equation', 'equation, adiabatic', 'I2t', 'let-through', 'current, let-through'. Although to be fair, 'k values' does.
Parents
  • 0
    The real answer is that a cpc - or other types of protective conductor - may be common to two or more circuits (example is where metallic conduit is used as a cpc, or a multicore cable serves more than one circuit), and therefore the single-circuit approach in 434 is not entirely appropriate.


    I agree that where a cpc is considered to be part of the circuit concerned (another rabbit hole to go down), and serves only that circuit, then sure it's a doubling up or repeat of an earlier requirement. However, in other cases, it's not that clear-cut.
Reply
  • 0
    The real answer is that a cpc - or other types of protective conductor - may be common to two or more circuits (example is where metallic conduit is used as a cpc, or a multicore cable serves more than one circuit), and therefore the single-circuit approach in 434 is not entirely appropriate.


    I agree that where a cpc is considered to be part of the circuit concerned (another rabbit hole to go down), and serves only that circuit, then sure it's a doubling up or repeat of an earlier requirement. However, in other cases, it's not that clear-cut.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines