This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Fatal Incident - Safe Isolation failure?

What do we think on this incident, reported a bit differently in these two locations:

Whilst very sad and no-one should lose their life in the workplace (or anywhere else) I can't help thinking that an engineer of 30 years' experience should have been familiar with safe isolation procedures, and perhaps these were not followed.  There are of course many unreported possibilities such as multiple supply sources not identified but if you follow the mantra of poking a verified test device probe in before anything else (like your fingers or a screwdriver….), then your chances of falling victim are much reduced.

Parents
  • slightly embarrassed to admit, but i have had two belts in my life, both of which would have been avoided if I had used my multimeter to test, both because I thought I had isolated the supply but hadn't. 

     

    If I touch copper now, I test, test again and test again, L-N L-E N-E and if there is some steel nearby, usually to that too. 

     

    It wasn't pleasant, I don't want to make the same mistake a third time.

     

    I also have fluke volt sticks, and don't rate them at all, both from activating on dead circuits, and not activating on live. 

Reply
  • slightly embarrassed to admit, but i have had two belts in my life, both of which would have been avoided if I had used my multimeter to test, both because I thought I had isolated the supply but hadn't. 

     

    If I touch copper now, I test, test again and test again, L-N L-E N-E and if there is some steel nearby, usually to that too. 

     

    It wasn't pleasant, I don't want to make the same mistake a third time.

     

    I also have fluke volt sticks, and don't rate them at all, both from activating on dead circuits, and not activating on live. 

Children
No Data