The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 31 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 3007 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Why do people twist CPC's?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

The latest video from “Doctor Electric” on YouTube has really annoyed me(titled "Best ZS Ever)!

What is it with these YouTube “Sparks” that they think they can just start up a channel and think they're god?

On this video Doctor Electric shows viewers how to twist the CPC's to get a better ZS!! UNBELIEVEABLE!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=448_LH9GKDo

Parents
  • 0

    Did you notice, in the Draft for Public Comment of Amendment No. 2, Regulation 543.7.1.204 (independent termination where two protective conductors are used to provide reinforced earthing for high protective conductor currents) is proposed for deletion?

    I hadn't (probably not aided by the lack of change bars in the DPC (grumble grumble…) and possibly feeling I'd possibly said enough about section 54 on the subject of foundation electrodes!)

    Given that the vast majority of c.p.c. failures I've seen have been at terminations (rather than along cable runs) - I can't help wondering what the underlying logic behind the change is (especially as the requirement for duplicate c.p.c.s. remains).

       - Andy.

Reply
  • 0

    Did you notice, in the Draft for Public Comment of Amendment No. 2, Regulation 543.7.1.204 (independent termination where two protective conductors are used to provide reinforced earthing for high protective conductor currents) is proposed for deletion?

    I hadn't (probably not aided by the lack of change bars in the DPC (grumble grumble…) and possibly feeling I'd possibly said enough about section 54 on the subject of foundation electrodes!)

    Given that the vast majority of c.p.c. failures I've seen have been at terminations (rather than along cable runs) - I can't help wondering what the underlying logic behind the change is (especially as the requirement for duplicate c.p.c.s. remains).

       - Andy.

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines