Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 31 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3512 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Why do people twist CPC's?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

The latest video from “Doctor Electric” on YouTube has really annoyed me(titled "Best ZS Ever)!

What is it with these YouTube “Sparks” that they think they can just start up a channel and think they're god?

On this video Doctor Electric shows viewers how to twist the CPC's to get a better ZS!! UNBELIEVEABLE!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=448_LH9GKDo

Parents
  • 0

    Did you notice, in the Draft for Public Comment of Amendment No. 2, Regulation 543.7.1.204 (independent termination where two protective conductors are used to provide reinforced earthing for high protective conductor currents) is proposed for deletion?

    I hadn't (probably not aided by the lack of change bars in the DPC (grumble grumble…) and possibly feeling I'd possibly said enough about section 54 on the subject of foundation electrodes!)

    Given that the vast majority of c.p.c. failures I've seen have been at terminations (rather than along cable runs) - I can't help wondering what the underlying logic behind the change is (especially as the requirement for duplicate c.p.c.s. remains).

       - Andy.

Reply
  • 0

    Did you notice, in the Draft for Public Comment of Amendment No. 2, Regulation 543.7.1.204 (independent termination where two protective conductors are used to provide reinforced earthing for high protective conductor currents) is proposed for deletion?

    I hadn't (probably not aided by the lack of change bars in the DPC (grumble grumble…) and possibly feeling I'd possibly said enough about section 54 on the subject of foundation electrodes!)

    Given that the vast majority of c.p.c. failures I've seen have been at terminations (rather than along cable runs) - I can't help wondering what the underlying logic behind the change is (especially as the requirement for duplicate c.p.c.s. remains).

       - Andy.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines